E Karpov my name is Ivan read. Karpov Evgeniy “My name is Ivan. Ray Bradbury "A Sound of Thunder"

Works from the Bookshelf that can be used when writing an essay for 2014-2015

Subject

A comment

“It’s not for nothing that all of Russia remembers...” (200th anniversary of M.Yu. Lermontov)

The poet's works studied at school.

Questions posed to humanity by war

1. E. Karpov “My name is Ivan”

2.V.Degtev “Cross”

3.I.Babel “Prischepa”

4. G. Sadullaev “Victory Day”

5. N. Evdokimov “Styopka, my son”

6.A.Borzenko “Easter”

7. B. Ekimov “Night of Healing”

8. A. Tolstoy “Russian character”

Man and nature in domestic and world literature

1. B. Ekimov “The night passes”

2. V. Shukshin “The Old Man, the Sun and the Girl”

3.V.Krupin “Drop the bag”

4.V. Rasputin “Farewell to Matera”

5.V. Shukshin “Zaletny”

6. V. Astafiev “He who does not grow, dies...”

7. V. Degtev “Intelligent beings”

8. V. Degtev “Dandelion”

9. I. Kuramshina “The Equivalent of Happiness”

1.Yu.Korotkov “Headache”

2. L. Kulikova “We met”

3. B. Ekimov “Speak, mother, speak...”

4. I. Kuramshina “Filial Duty”

5. B. Ekimov “About a foreign land”

How do people live?

1. L. Tolstoy “How do people live?”

2. B. Ekimov “About a foreign land”

3.Yu.Buyda "Khimich"

4. B. Ekimov “The night passes”

5. L. Petrushevskaya “Glitch”

6.V.Degtev “Dandelion”

7.Yu.Korotkov “Headache”

8. I. Kuramshina “Teresa Syndrome”

9. V. Tendryakov “Bread for the Dog” and other works

Preview:

Sets of topics for the FINAL ESSAY for the 2014-2015 academic year.

Developed by N.A. Mokrysheva with the assistance of L.M. Bendeleva, O.N. Belyaeva, I.V. Mazalova.

Block 1.

Lermontov.

Block 2.

War.

Block 3

Human and nature.

Block 4.

Dispute between generations.

Block 5

How do people live?

TOPIC QUESTION

1. What is the role of M.Yu. Lermontov in the history of Russian culture?

2. “In our age, all feelings are only temporary.” Is it possible to evaluate the emotional life of the generation of the information age with the aphorism of M. Yu. Lermontov?

3. What is the “strangeness” of the love of the lyrical hero of M.Yu. Lermontov’s poems for the Motherland?

4. What is unique about the love theme in the lyrics of M.Yu. Lermontov?

5. What is consonant and what is not consonant with my worldview in the lyrics of M.Yu. Lermontov?

6. The lyrics of M.Yu. Lermontov are incomprehensible to the modern reader. Is it so?

7. Who is he, “the hero of our time”?

1.Why did children grow up early during the war?

2.What is the role of Russian women in the Great Patriotic War?

3. Is there a place for mercy and humanity in war?

4. Why is it necessary to preserve the memory of the defenders of the Fatherland who died during the Second World War?

5.What is the tragedy and greatness of a soldier’s fate?

6.How does a person’s worldview change during war?

7. Where did people draw moral strength during the Second World War?

8.What is the significance of simple human values ​​in war?

9. Why is the value of life especially acute in war?

10. How do the concepts of “love” and “war” relate?

11.Russian character... How did the spirit of our people manifest themselves in the face of severe military trials?

12.What was the price of victory in the Second World War?

13.What lessons of the Second World War does humanity need to know and remember?

14.For whom does the bell toll?

15. What was the reason for mass heroism during the Second World War - fear of the system or patriotism?

1. Is man the king of nature?

2.Is nature a temple or a workshop?

3. Is nature capable of changing a person, making him better?

4. Why does man fail before the forces of nature?

5. What are the consequences of man’s thoughtless, consumerist attitude towards the natural world?

6. How does scientific and technological progress affect the relationship between man and nature?

7. How does nature affect the human soul?

8.What does nature teach man?

9.Why is it important to take care of nature?

10. How to teach a person to see beauty in nature?

1. What should family relationships be built on?

2. How to overcome the misunderstanding that sometimes arises in the relationship between parents and children?

3.What is the importance of home and family in a child’s life?

4.Why do children suffer?

5.What should a family be like?

6.Why shouldn’t we forget our father’s house?

7.What is dangerous about the lack of mutual understanding between generations?

8. How should the younger generation relate to the experience of their elders?

9.How does the era affect the relationship between fathers and children?

10.Is conflict between fathers and children inevitable?

11.What does it mean to become an adult?

12. Is love and respect for parents a sacred feeling?

1. What kind of people become easy prey for evil?

2. Why is love stronger than death?

3. What kind of person can be called a real hero?

4.What qualities allow a person to resist fate?

5.Does money rule the world?

6.What does it mean to live according to your conscience?

7. What determines a person’s moral choice?

8.What are the manifestations of a person’s strength and weakness?

9.Is nobility capable of resisting evil?

10.What is true happiness?

11.What should a true friend be like?

12.What lessons of kindness and mercy does life teach us?

13. What is the importance of self-esteem for a person?

14.Why is it necessary to be careful about people’s feelings?

15. What is the true beauty of a person?

16. Does the end justify the means?

17.What life goals help a person live his life with dignity?

18. Why is indifference scary?

19.What are the origins of true patriotism?

20. Is there any meaning in self-sacrifice?

21.Why does a person work?

22.Is happiness possible at any cost?

23.Hero - does it sound loud?

24. Good must be with fists?

25. Virtue, love, mercy, selflessness...Atavisms?26.What can help people find peace of mind in difficult life situations?

SUBJECT-

JUDGMENT

1. “All of Russia remembers Borodin’s day...”

2. Lermontov’s mastery in revealing the “history of the human soul”

3. Confession as a means of self-characterization of the hero in the works of M.Yu. Lermontov.

4. “No, I’m not Byron, I’m another, yet unknown chosen one...”

5. Lermontov’s skill in creating the character of the hero.

6. Past, present and future on the pages of the works of M.Yu. Lermontov

1. War is a crime against humanity.

2. Childhood scorched by war.

3. “War does not have a woman’s face”

4. Great and immortal is your feat, people.

5. War is not fireworks at all...

6. War as a test of a person’s spiritual qualities.

7.”I will not tire of making sure that the Eternal Flame does not go out”

1. “A person, even if he is a genius three times, remains a thinking plant...”

2. “We are responsible for those we have tamed.”

3. “Not what you think, nature: not a cast, not a soulless face...”

4. Man and nature are one.

5.Love for nature - love for the Motherland.

6. Animals are our faithful friends and helpers.

7. Man's responsibility to nature.

8. “Understand the language of living nature - and you will say: the world is beautiful...” (I.S. Nikitin).

9. “God's light is good. There is only one thing that is not good - us” (A.P. Chekhov).

10.Nature is a wise teacher.

1. Loneliness with family.

2. Loss of communication between generations is the path to the moral decline of society.

3. “Education is a great thing: it decides a person’s fate...” (V.G. Belinsky).

1. The moral power of good.

2. True and false heroism.

3. A friend is known in need.

4. “The highest court is the court of conscience” (V. Hugo)

5. The uplifting power of love.

6. “To believe in good, you need to start doing it” (L. N. Tolstoy)

7. “Humanity cannot live without generous ideas” (F.M. Dostoevsky)

8. “Whoever has not suffered and who has not made mistakes has not learned the price of truth and happiness.”

(N.A. Dobrolyubov)

9. “Happiness and joy in life are in truth…” (A.P. Chekhov)

10. “Patriotism does not consist in pompous exclamations...” (V.G. Belinsky)

11. “Compassion is the highest form of human existence...” (F.M. Dostoevsky)

12. “There is no happiness in inaction...” (F.M. Dostoevsky).

13. “To live honestly, you have to rush, get confused, fight, make mistakes...” (L.N. Tolstoy).

14. “Honor cannot be taken away, it can be lost...” (A.P. Chekhov).

15. “Conscience, nobility and dignity - this is our holy army” (B. Okudzhava).

16. “You have to live, you have to love, you have to believe...” (L.N. Tolstoy)

SUBJECT-

CONCEPT

1. The artistic originality of Lermontov’s lyrics.

2. Man and nature in Lermontov’s lyrics.

3. Reading Lermontov...

4. The theme of loneliness in Lermontov’s lyrics

5. High society in the image of Lermontov

6.Civil motives in Lermontov’s lyrics.

7.The theme of love in Lermontov’s lyrics

8. The rebellious spirit of Lermontov’s lyrics

9. The theme of the poet and poetry in Lermontov’s lyrics

10. The theme of the homeland in Lermontov’s works

11.Theme of the Caucasus in the works of Lermontov

12. The image of a strong personality in Lermontov’s works

13. Folk poetic motifs in Lermontov’s lyrics.

1. Children of war.

2. War without embellishment

3. War is a tragedy of the people.

4. Woman and war.

5. Moral origins of man’s feat in war.

6. Russian character in works about the Second World War.

7. Ordinary fascism.

8.War and motherhood.

9. Echo of war.

1. Understanding the beauty in nature.

2.Nature and scientific and technological progress.

1. The world through the eyes of a child.

2.Family in the modern world.

3. The role of the family in the formation of personality.

4. The role of the family in determining a teenager’s place in society.

5. The role of childhood in a person’s life.

6. Lonely old age.

1. Man in search of happiness

2. Man in search of the meaning of life.

3. Russian national character.

4. The nature of betrayal.

5. Tests of conscience.

6. Conflict of feelings and duty.

The classification of topics is taken from the collection of I.K. Sushilina, T.A. Shchepakova “Methodological instructions and test assignments in literature (preparation for essays).” Moscow State University, 2001

Preview:

Preparing for an essay

Algorithm for preparing for the final essay

  1. Choose a direction. The first direction is the most knowledge-intensive and requires precise knowledge. (For future philologists).

The other areas are similar in this regard, although the most advantageous, in my opinion, is about war.

  1. Read (where you find them, there are many of them on different sites) sample topics within the chosen direction and break them into groups.

In the direction about the war there are about three of them:

1) war is a tragedy;

2) feat, courage, heroism in war;

3) patriotism.

  1. Write a “basic” essay on one specific topic.

I suggest writing according to the following scheme. The simplest one looks like this:

introduction - "1st argument" - "2nd argument" - personal opinion - conclusion.

By “arguments” we should understand the analysis of the selected works.

4. Now let's play Lego. Just as you can assemble both an airplane and a horse from the same cubes, so you can compose completely different texts from the basic parts of essays. You just need to be able to place accents. How to do it?

4.1. It is necessary to prepare several introductions of different types (in our case three), which will contain a statement of problems for each group. How to do this, read from the Alexandrovs (although you can “meet” again)

4.2. Now we work with the text. As a rule, every good book about war has material for each group of topics. But it can be made even simpler: the same episode can be given different ratings depending on the topic. For example, if a hero dies while completing a task, then this deserves both praise (heroism, patriotism) and a negative assessment (war takes away the best people).

4.3. But what if you have an excellent essay prepared, but the topic is completely “left-wing”? For example, you prepared essays about the war for all three groups, and suggested the topic “Love in War.” What should I do? Let's play Lego between directions! An essay about feat and courage can easily be rewritten for the 5th direction ("How people live..."), if the topic is about the meaning of life, moral values ​​or personal qualities...

5. When writing, do not be lazy to re-read the essay after each paragraph, preferably in a whisper (and not to yourself). This helps you stay on topic and notice the tautology in time.

6. With the conclusion - everything is as usual. Repeat the main thoughts, add a little pathos. Just a little bit, don’t lie!

To write this essay, you need to imagine how they lived before, what they thought about, what was most important to them, then you can find out their morals and views on moral values. And as a counterbalance, put Oblomov, whose name has already become a household name. Draw parallels between the great figures of that time and the life of Oblomov himself, see what Oblomov could have achieved and why he became so indifferent. A person by himself does not become inert; apparently his aspirations were dashed at the very beginning of his youth, or maybe he simply silently contemplated what was happening and drew conclusions. After all, sometimes you don’t want to do anything when you realize that there is no point.

The conclusion may consist in a general description of the characteristics of that environment and how it can all end, what a society will come to in which callousness and inertia of views flourish, is it not time to wake up to clap your hands loudly, thereby awakening the thoughts and consciousness of those around you. The topic of morality is always a hot topic in society, and you can tell your philosophical views in your essay. how do you see what is happening, why it is bad and why it should not be so. At the same time, Oblomov was not a bad person, isn’t kindness part of indifference to the fight?

So, how to write an essay on the topic: “how people live, guided by” the novel “OBLOMOV”. Firstly: this is, of course, an introduction. (Briefly describe the issues that you will cover in your essay, but do it beautifully) Secondly: as I call it, the main part of the essay. (Draw a parallel between the current aspects of society, which in your opinion is guided by this very society and what is described in the work. Indicate the points of contact and differences between these two worlds. Give modern examples of our time - Oblomovism. Even modern actors, critics, artists, which the press describes in the context of Oblomovism) And thirdly: the final part (summarize everything you described above, express your opinion, both negative and sometimes compassionate. That is, let the teacher know that you have not only read the novel, but also really understand what it’s about he (even if this is not so) that you understand what motivated Oblomov and that you feel sorry for him in some ways: narrow-mindedness, selfishness and, in the end, nothing worth holding on to, etc.)

As an introduction, I would say about the current relevance of this novel in terms of modern lazy people who also spend their whole lives on the couch in front of the TV. Then the main part would come, a comparison of Oblomov’s life and the general state of moral and ethical principles of that time. Oblomov, like other heroes, turned out to be a hero of his time, since he was not alone, he was not just a fabrication, this was a general trend. I would consider the question of Oblomov’s happiness and unhappiness. To conclude, we can speculate about the general reasons for fleeing into the illusory world and falling out of reality. Express your thoughts about why people begin to feel superfluous, lose or do not look for the meaning of life, and why this happens at all times. Don’t forget about the role of the intelligentsia, because a simple peasant will not become a sybaritist, he will simply die of hunger.

To write an essay on a topic"How people live" , first you need to make a plan for it, and then reveal each point by carefully re-reading the novel itself"Oblomov" . I can sketch out a plan, and you will develop the idea further.

  • Introduction. Here you can write about what the situation was like at the time the novel was written.
  • Main part. In this part, describe Oblomov’s qualities and why such a smart, kind, honest person suddenly turned out to be unnecessary for society (laziness, instead of an active life - daydreaming, inactivity). Write that a person does not live by dreams alone; he also needs to do something, for himself, for the people around him, for nature, etc.
  • In conclusion, write that you don’t need to wait for someone to come and do something good, you need to have an active life position yourself.

In general, this is so short.

In an essay on the topic “How do people live?” it is necessary to reveal the philosophical component of the life of mankind, if we take Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” as a basis, we should develop the idea in the direction of how relevant the problem of people like Ilya Ilyich is today. Discuss the meaninglessness of the lives of idle people who, by their unwillingness to do something, change something, make their lives unbearably gray and empty. Write about how human life is constant growth, action, spiritual development. As soon as a person ceases to be interested in life, he wraps himself in his cozy robe and grows his roots towards the sofa, he begins to degrade.

Option 3

Is war capable of destroying the reserves of humanity in a person? Or is it in human nature to love even one’s enemy?It seems to me that V. Tendryakov raises precisely these problematic issues in his text. It is this moral problem that worries the author, so he seeks to involve us in joint reasoning.

In his text, V. Tendryakov describesfire in a German hospital. Despite the hostilities, at least a drop of compassion and empathy remains in people. “The tragedy taking place in plain sight was not alien to anyone,” writes the author. Tendryakov gives specific examples of how former enemies are able to come to each other’s aid. For example, Guard Captain Arkady Kirillovich, noticing how “a German with his head wrapped was trembling near his shoulder,” took off his warm sheepskin coat and handed it to the German.The author also tells us aboutthe feat of a Tatar soldier who threw himself into the fire to save a disabled German.

Agreeing with this point of view of the author, I want to rememberthe work of V. Zakrutkin “Mother of Man”, which describes the events of the Second World War. Having occupied the farm in which Maria, the main character of the story, lived, her son Vasyatka and husband Ivan, the Nazis ruined everything, burned the farm, drove the people to Germany, and hanged Ivan and Vasyatka. Only Maria managed to escape. Alone, she had to fight for her life and for the life of her unborn child. Experiencing a burning hatred for the Nazis, Maria, having met a wounded young German, rushes at him with a pitchfork, wanting to avenge her son and husband. But the German, a defenseless boy, shouted: “Mom! Mother!" And the Russian woman’s heart trembled.

Speaking about the problem of text, I remembera scene from Leo Tolstoy’s epic novel “War and Peace,” where the Russians and the French, who were bitter enemies at that time, joked and talked to each other. “After this, it seemed that it was necessary to unload the guns, detonate the charges, and everyone should quickly go home,” says the author. But this does not happen, and Tolstoy regrets that the “reserves of humanity” remained unused.

In conclusion, I want to say that the text by V. Tendryakov proposed for analysis prompted me to think aboutthat in every person there is humanity, only some have more of it, some have less, and in difficult situations this humanity will always manifest itself.

The question in the title of this essay is taken from a story by Leo Tolstoy. This question is perhaps relevant at all times. Especially in turning points, times of crisis. When some try to talk about some kind of “golden age” of Russian history, they simply do not know this history properly.

Everything in Russia has always been relative - regarding people, politics, external and internal relations. And in general, everything depends on the internal attitude of each person: if you stand for good, want to bring peace and light to people, it means that mostly good people will gather around you. If it’s the other way around, then there will be more evil.

How are people alive today? Society is stratified into rich and poor. There is no full-fledged middle class. This leaves an imprint on the entire nation, on the entire people. But even in this not entirely normal situation, there are always those who are satisfied with their simple lot, who strive to live and not survive.

For example, those who are located in the provinces. This is a very specific environment: relations between people are still kinder and more cordial, the pull of the earth is stronger, and the breath of progress is felt much weaker than in capitals and centers. Here people are busy with personal farming, spend a lot of time in the fresh air - picking mushrooms and berries in the forest, then storing them for the winter.

Communication may seem primitive: everyone knows each other, they meet often, several times a day. There are also feasts on the occasion of some holidays or even without them, when those gathered at the table sing in chorus old Soviet or Russian folk songs. This is how people live - by the memory of their souls and hearts, by caring for their neighbors, by ineradicable optimism.

As for the rich, their lives seem to be more varied, but in reality they are much more boring. There is no money, as they say, there is enough for everything, the house is a full cup. But there was no happiness – simple, human – and there still isn’t. And all the entertainment and trips are just a way to disperse the melancholy of loneliness. And when it fails, ordinary everyday drunkenness begins, followed by personal degradation.

Middle class people have a lot to lose. They achieved everything in life almost exclusively on their own, without bending or bowing. Therefore, they value what they have and are not going to part with it. They live mostly from paycheck to paycheck, but if they set a goal, they can save up capital within a year for a trip abroad. And so it’s mainly work and home. There is catastrophically not enough time for self-education, to read books that have been put off for a long time.

Adolescents and young adults are most often left to their own devices. Parents have little idea of ​​what their child lives and breathes. It’s good if there is a senior mentor nearby who can ignite and captivate you – with cycling trips, for example, or sports in general. Then the guys won't waste their time in vain. But for the most part, the younger generation learns through the cracks - because their parents need it, they become accustomed to bad habits, and do not have clear moral principles.

People of creative professions live the most interesting lives. For someone who is busy with his own creativity, it doesn’t matter what happens around him. First, he “cooks in his own juice,” then he comes out to people. And if there is a response, a dialogue arises, it means that the person is talented, he has something to say to others, to leave a piece of himself in this world.

Man is designed in such a way that he will never be satisfied with what he already has. Because otherwise, spiritual death is much earlier than physical death, as in Chekhov’s famous story “Ionych”. While we are alive, we worry, rejoice, and grieve. There is always something that makes us active.

How to prepare for your graduation essay


1. Choose a direction. I don’t recommend taking 1st (according to Lermontov). It is the most science-intensive and requires precise knowledge. For future philologists. The other areas are similar in this regard, although the most advantageous, in my opinion, is about war.

2. Read (via the links above) sample topics within the chosen direction and break them into groups. In the direction about war, there are about three of them: 1) war is a tragedy; 2) feat, courage, heroism in war; 3) patriotism.

3. Write a “basic” essay on one specific topic. I propose to write according to the Alexandrov system, but you just need to change the composition a little. The simplest one looks like this: introduction - “1st argument” - “2nd argument” - personal opinion - conclusion. By “arguments” we should understand the analysis of the selected works.

4. Now let's play Lego. Just as you can assemble both an airplane and a horse from the same cubes, so you can compose completely different texts from the basic parts of essays. You just need to be able to place accents. How to do it?

4.1. It is necessary to prepare several introductions of different types (in our case three), which will contain a statement of problems for each group. How to do this, read from the Alexandrovs (although you can “meet” again)

4.2. Now we work with the text. As a rule, every good book about war has material for each group of topics. But it can be made even simpler: the same episode can be given different ratings depending on the topic. For example, if a hero dies while completing a task, then this deserves both praise (heroism, patriotism) and a negative assessment (war takes away the best people).

4.3. But what if you have an excellent essay prepared, but the topic is completely “left-wing”? For example, you prepared essays about the war for all three groups, and suggested the topic “Love in War.” What should I do? Let's play Lego between directions! An essay about feat and courage can easily be rewritten for the 5th direction ("How people live..."), if the topic is about the meaning of life, moral values ​​or personal qualities...

5. When you write, don’t be lazy to re-read your essay after each paragraph, preferably in a whisper (and not to yourself). This helps you stay on topic and notice the tautology in time.

6. With the conclusion - everything is as usual. Repeat the main thoughts, add a little pathos. Just a little bit, don’t lie!

List of references for the final essay. Literature for graduation essay


1. “It’s not for nothing that all of Russia remembers...”

Works by M.Yu. Lermontov: “Mtsyri”, “Hero of Our Time”,
- “Demon”, “Song about the merchant Kalashnikov..”, “Prisoner of the Caucasus”.
- Lyrics: “No, I’m not Byron, I’m different...”, “Clouds”, “Beggar”, “From under a mysterious, cold half-mask...”, “Sail”, “Death of a Poet”,
- “Borodino”, “When the yellowing field is worried...”, - - - “Prophet”, “Both boring and sad.”

2. “Questions posed to humanity by war”

"The Tale of Igor's Campaign"
L.N. Tolstoy "War and Peace"
M.A. Sholokhov "Quiet Don"
V.S. Grossman "Life and Fate"
M.A. Sholokhov “The Fate of Man”
V.L. Kondratiev “Sashka” (humanity, compassion)
V.V. Bykov "Sotnikov" (betrayal)
IN. Bogomolov “Ivan” (courage)
A.I. Pristavkin “The golden cloud spent the night”

3. “Man and nature in domestic and world literature.”

"The Tale of Igor's Campaign"
I.S. Turgenev “Notes of a Hunter”, “Asya”
A.I. Kuprin "Olesya"
MM. Prishvin "Pantry of the Sun"
M.A. Sholokhov "Quiet Don"
V.P. Astafiev "Tsar Fish"
♣ ♣ V.P. Kataev “The Lonely Sail Whitens”
Ch. Aitmatov “The Scaffold”

4. “Dispute between generations: together and apart”

A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit"
DI. Fonvizin "Nedorosl"
I.S. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons"
L.N. Tolstoy "War and Peace"
A.N. Ostrovsky "Thunderstorm"
A.P. Chekhov "The Cherry Orchard"
V.G. Rasputin "Farewell to Matera"

5. “How do people live?”

I.A. Goncharov "Oblomov"
F.M. Dostoevsky "Crime and Punishment"
L.N. Tolstoy "War and Peace"
I.A. Bunin "Mr. from San Francisco"
M. Gorky “Old Woman Izergil”, “At the Bottom”.
M.A. Bulgakov "The Master and Margarita"

Fragment No. 1

What is literature to a person? A way to take your mind off your problems? Source of the world's knowledge? Empathy for the heroes? Each of us will answer this question differently (after all, we are people who are different from each other).

I can say with confidence that for me literature is the most faithful, honest adviser. In my favorite works, even when I reread them many times, I always find some kind of help and mutual understanding for myself. For example, the works “Three Comrades” by Erich Maria Remarque and the dystopia “1984” by George Orwell helped me answer questions about true friendship and trust in people.

But today I want to talk about the great twentieth-century writer Ray Bradbury. In 1951, Ray Bradbury writes a short but exciting science fiction story, “There May Be Tigers Here.” On a rocket whose speed is “equal to the speed of God himself,” a group of researchers lands on a planet in a distant system to study it. But unexpectedly for themselves, the astronauts realize that they have not just landed in an as yet unexplored world. They landed in childhood. The planet gives them the ability to understand, makes them feel the lightest and most pleasant breath of wind, which reminds Driscoll and Captain Foster (one of the main characters) of that carefree distant time when they were still boys, when they could calmly play on the summer lawn of their native Earth in croquet. “These are people who have always remained children, and therefore see and feel everything beautiful,” Bradbury seems to be telling us. But among the astronauts there is also Chatterton, a cruel and distrustful man who ultimately paid for his disrespectful treatment of the planet: he was poisoned by clean water, lost the drill with which he tried to drill into the Earth, and was torn apart by an unknown beast, whose roar was like the growl of a tiger.

It would seem that this is just a story about a space expedition, about the distant future, about the inexplicable miracles of the nation that were happening on the planet (mirages, lack of gravity, etc.). But in fact, the author created this work to show us different images of the human soul. Of course, in the story “There May Be Tigers Here” we are faced with several difficult questions: “how should we behave with nature?”, “how should we be able to hear important advice in a timely manner?” But as the main problem Bradbury calls the callousness and old age of the soul, as Chatterton had it, he gives us examples of Forester and Driscoll, sincere and honest people.

Ray Bradbury's story helped me understand what leads to greed, mistrust and anger, those qualities that are so characteristic of adults, boring and boring people. And most importantly, I received an answer to the question “should a person grow up?” No, now I can say it with confidence. We grow up in body and mind, but, in my opinion, we must leave our soul forever in the world of childhood, we must be able to dream and truly enjoy life, endlessly desire to learn something new, be open and honest, as children do. And thanks to Ray Bradbury and his magnificent works for completely helping me understand this problem.

Administrator's Note

A fragment of the first work was written by a well-prepared graduate who has his own reading preferences and is capable of deeply, sincerely, informally reasoning within the framework of a given topic, choosing a personal perspective for its disclosure (some speech defects do not contradict this conclusion). He managed to make an interesting choice of supporting text, problematize the material, and think through the original thesis and evidence part of the essay. You cannot expect obvious literary talents from most graduates. The second and third essays are weaker than the first, but, undoubtedly, in the first parameter (as well as in other criteria) they deserve a “pass” grade. It is interesting to compare them, because... graduates choose different ways to explore the topic.

Fragment No. 2

We are all different. Each of us is unique, inimitable. Everyone is destined to go through their own, sometimes thorny, path. And, of course, life raises many questions that are difficult to answer on your own.

A person needs to get answers to life's questions in order to become truly happy and begin to live fully. After all, as the famous English writer Jack London said, “the true purpose of man is to live; and not exist." Therefore, we turn to the most important source of knowledge - literature, in which there is always an answer to any question.

So, in the novel “The Theater” by Somerset Maugham, I discovered a lot of new things that I want to talk about. A brief retelling of events is indispensable.

Julia, an aspiring actress, falls in love with a handsome colleague who feels nothing for her. It would seem that a normal person would not seek attention, much less marriage, from someone who does not reciprocate. But not Julia. She achieved Michael, then stunning success on stage, becoming the best actress in England. When Michael goes to war (World War I), she loses all her feelings for him and celebrates the victory - because now both spouses are equal.

She is already forty-six years old, she is known throughout the country, her marriage is considered ideal, she is the mother of an almost adult son...

Suddenly, a young accountant, Thomas Fennel, appears on the horizon and falls madly in love with the main character, despite the fact that she is old enough to be his mother. And Julia, oddly enough, responds to his confessions, even though she has a husband. An affair with a young boy raises her already high self-esteem and awakens even greater selfishness in her. She does everything for her boyfriend that would offend any man: pays for his housing, buys him clothes, gives him expensive gifts... And then Thomas falls in love with an inexperienced actress of his age - Avis Kryten, who, according to him, is “very talented” .

On the day of Avis's debut, Julia rejoices in her lack of feelings for Thomas - and turns the premiere into her triumphant performance...

“Is this really all the life of one woman? Is a person obsessed with himself really capable of this?” - involuntarily flashes through my head. Julia inspires admiration for her ability to play different roles masterfully and with amazing ease. The image of the heroine would be almost flawless if not for egocentrism. Julia Lambert helps answer many of life's questions: what to do in a given situation.

First of all, you need to find yourself and your calling, and you need to achieve success in this area. You need to be able to adapt to people, to be different depending on the occasion. It is necessary to achieve the set goals, however, thoughtfully and without harm to society.

Finally, the main question in life is what is love? Thanks to "Theater" you realize that the love described in it is false and is not a role model.

After all, this unique feeling must be sincere and not fleeting. Each of us needs to experience this magical state. Love teaches you to see the good in people and society as a whole, and allows you to discover new, previously unknown talents and abilities of an individual. But how can we find it if we are surrounded by “theater” all the time?...

Administrator's Note

Fragment No. 2 shows that the author of the essay builds an idea based on a retelling of the plot of the novel “The Theater” by Somerset Maugham and including some laconic comments in it: reflections on the situation and a personal assessment of the moral choice of the heroine (these comments are highlighted in bold). After a condensed retelling, the problems that the author of the essay thought about after reading the novel “Theater” are listed. You may not agree with the student’s conclusions, but they are presented succinctly and consistently (we must not forget that the formulation of the topic of the essay presupposes a personal perspective on its disclosure).

Fragment No. 3 ... The depiction of war in the novel “War and Peace” certainly raises the problem of humanity in war. In one of the battles, Nikolai Rostov saw in his French enemy, whom he was never able to kill, an ordinary person, a “simple indoor face” with a hole in his chin. The same forced military man as himself, the same person who wants to live and suffers because of the ambitions of those in power. This idea has been and will always be relevant. More than a hundred years later, the most famous work of E.M. will be written. Remark: “All Quiet on the Western Front.” One of his heroes also ponders this question, not understanding why he killed his enemy, because he is not only and not so much an enemy as a person, because he also breathed and loved, because he also had a family, a wife, children. Remarque also expresses the idea of ​​​​the equality of people, the incorrectness of dividing them into “pure” and “impure”, worthy of living and not in another work “Night in Lisbon”. Another war and the same thought, which does not lose its meaning, is repeated once again. The idea of ​​equal, “humane” treatment of people, regardless of their origin, regardless of political beliefs and religion, regardless of what passport they have and where they came from.

Thus, we see how fiction asks us vital questions, makes us think about them and answer them, at least for ourselves. In works, especially those based on historical facts and events, the writer, summarizing the experience of generations and his point of view, gives a possible answer to those questions to which, due to their nature, cannot be given a universal answer, forces one to recognize what may have become an obvious answer on socially significant issues, which, although it is difficult, unpleasant and difficult, need to be talked about, thus contributing to the solution of pressing problems.

Administrator's Note

In fragment No. 3, the author of the essay reflects directly on the proposed problem, constructs a statement based on theses related to the topic, relying on works of art, but avoiding retelling. Literary material does not lead the student, but is used by him precisely as the basis for his own reflections. It is worth noting the successful comparison of an episode from “War and Peace” with the novel by E.-M. Remarque, although the substantiation of the theses with references to the text of Remarque’s novel could have been more thorough.

__________________

Reminder for writing an essay


1. You cannot write an essay on a work that you have not read. Your ignorance will always be noticeable to the teacher, and you risk receiving a remark like “The topic is not understood and not covered,” or “The work is superficial,” or an unsatisfactory grade in literature.

2. Do you know the historical and literary background of the creation of the work, its history, the basic facts of the writer’s life (especially those when the work was written)?

3. Is the meaning of the title clear and can you explain it? What about the theme and idea?

5. Can you retell the plot and highlight the main parts of the conflict? What is the nature of the conflict? (ideological – in “Crime and Punishment”, social – in “The Thunderstorm”, psychological – in the story “After the Ball”).

6. What do you think are the features of the composition? Name its main parts and the episodes corresponding to them.

7. Do you understand the system of characters in the work and how the characters relate to each other? (antipodes - Stolz and Oblomov, comparison - Prince Andrei and Pierre).

9. Can you note the main features of this writer’s style (laconism, attention to detail, etc.)?

10. Carefully study every word of the topic. Perhaps there is a hook here for an introduction or another part of the work. Change the narrative topic to a question topic.

For example, the topic is “The Image of Chatsky.”

a) What artistic techniques did Griboyedov use to create the image of Chatsky?
b) How is Chatsky close to our time? and so on.

This will be the main idea of ​​your work.

11. Write a plan

a) Introduction (title it!): historical, biographical, comparative, analytical, quotation, personal.
b) The main part (title it) - arguments based on text analysis and knowledge of literary material.
c) Conclusion (title it!).

Criticisms should not be expressed here as the end of the work. Summarize your reasoning: what did you see? noted? What is the significance, relevance, value of images, works for the history of literature?

12. Don’t engage in retelling: this is not an exposition. Do not overload your essay with quotes, especially poetic ones. The advantage of a quotation is brevity and relevance. At the same time, working without citations will cast doubt on your knowledge of the text.

13. Parts of the work must be proportionate, logically connected and consistent. Remember the role of paragraphs.

14. Do not “over-praise” the classics: “brilliant”, “great national”, etc. Avoid speech cliches and repetitions.

__________________

Dispute between generations: together and apart


At all times, on all continents, among other material and spiritual values, inherited from generation to generation, there is one that you really want to get rid of, like an unhealed wound, because it cannot be called valuable. This is a generational conflict. And it becomes a disaster if the mind gives way to pride. How to build bridges between maturity and youth and cut the sword of Damocles of cold, strained (sometimes to the point of hatred) relations between fathers and children? How to go through life: together or apart?

The answer to this question is painfully sought by parents in the family, whose children are increasingly moving away, suffering no less than them. And, of course, writers try to penetrate into the most remote corners of human suffering from misunderstanding of those closest to them. Among the masters of words this is I.S. Turgenev, who told us about the grief of the parents of his only beloved son Enyushka. This is the fate of the author himself, whose mother was a despotic woman who did not take into account either her son’s writing abilities or his own point of view on anything, including his personal life. Of course, L.N. Tolstoy, I.A. Bunin, who told us about the problems of adolescence. Among my contemporaries is my favorite English writer, Nicholas Sparks, whose book will be discussed in my discussions on this issue.

Dispute between generations: together and apart

(based on the novel by English writer Nicholas Sparks “The Last Song”)

At all times, on all continents, among other material and spiritual values, inherited from generation to generation, there is one that you really want to get rid of, like an unhealed wound, because it cannot be called valuable. This is a generational conflict. And it becomes a disaster if the mind gives way to pride. How to build bridges between maturity and youth and cut the sword of Damocles of cold, strained (sometimes to the point of hatred) relations between fathers and children? How to go through life: together or apart?

The answer to this question is painfully sought by parents in the family, whose children are increasingly moving away, suffering no less than them. And, of course, writers try to penetrate into the most remote corners of human suffering from misunderstanding of those closest to them. Among the masters of words this is I.S. Turgenev, who told us about the grief of the parents of his only beloved son Enyushka. This is the fate of the author himself, whose mother was a despotic woman who did not take into account either her son’s writing abilities or his own point of view on anything, including his personal life. Of course, L.N. Tolstoy, I.A. Bunin, who told us about the problems of adolescence. Among my contemporaries is my favorite English writer, Nicholas Sparks, whose book will be discussed in my discussions on this issue.

The novel “The Last Song” is a hymn of love, manifested in everything: in a look, in a gesture, in a word, in music, and spreading to family, to friends, to our little brothers. But you have to grow to such love by making your way, and sometimes pushing your way through the unexpected obstacles that life throws at you at every step. Get there, throwing away arrogance and pride, learning to listen and understand the language of people close to you. As the heroine of the novel Ronnie did. Just eight months ago, an eighteen-year-old girl who dreamed of a vacation with friends in Manhattan was forced, at the request of her mother, to go to her father in North Carolina for the entire summer vacation, like going to hell in the middle of nowhere. On the way there, she asked herself questions: “why... her mother and father hate her so much,” “why did she have to go to her father, to this hopeless southern wilderness, to hell with her?” She didn’t even want to listen to her mother’s arguments that it was necessary, that her daughter had not seen her father for three years, that she did not answer the phone when her father called her, etc.

So I touched on Ronnie’s first mental trauma – the divorce of his parents. Was it possible to explain that the mother fell in love with another? There were no such words in the soul of the person closest to her, but she easily referred to her father’s failure, to his “failure” in life. “As a result, the marriage broke up, the daughter runs away from him like fire, and the son grows up without a father.” The daughter considered her father’s departure a betrayal for one single reason: her mother did not have the courage and wisdom to tell the whole truth. As a result, two children suffer: the growing daughter Ronnie and the wonderful little boy John.

And now, three years later, the daughter and father are together again in a godforsaken place, where the father’s house was as drafty as it was in their souls. “Hello, sunshine. I'm glad to see you". But instead of the sun, there was not the same “typical American girl,” but a young woman with a purple streak in her long brown hair, black nail polish and dark clothes,” who did not deign him with her attention. And for almost all three summer months, this outrageous girl, as she seemed to me at first, responded to her father’s friendly words, to his concern for her nutrition, to his desire not to disturb her (as long as she was nearby) with either silent coldness or soul-hurting antics. She ran away from home, spoke with hatred about the piano, and covered her ears when her father played it. And once she even said, setting the condition not to interfere in her life: “I’m not just going home. I won’t talk to you again in my life.”

And the answer is love. It was as if these words never happened, the cop didn’t come, her impudent behavior didn’t exist. There was a fenced-off piano, the belief that the daughter could not steal, and more often - a silent presence, coupled with care and affection for her children suffering from divorce. Such is the power of the love of a wise man who understands that the whole truth of human existence lies “in the love that he feels for his children, in the pain that torments him when he wakes up in a silent house and realizes that they are not here.” There is also another pain that the children are not aware of - he does not have long to live. What kind of courage Steve had to have not to bring down the burden of his physical suffering on his son and daughter, but to take care of them with such dedication that only a loving heart is capable of.

There will be many sacrifices on the father's part. Very! But there will be the most important thing - the last song. A melody composed by him and completed by his talented daughter. Music, which became a bridge of love and friendship in their destiny. How important it is to understand in time that parental love and faith in their children is the force that can melt any ice in a relationship, as fortunately happened with the main characters of the novel by Nicholas Sparks.

Teacher of Russian language and literature

Tsarakova Nadezhda Radionovna, 2014

MKOU "Secondary school No. 15 Svetly"

Mirninsky district of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)

Preview:

Artistically expressive
means of poetic speech (tropes)

Trope

Characteristic

Example from the text

Epithet

A figurative definition that gives an additional artistic characteristic of an object or phenomenon in the form of comparison

Below us with a roar cast iron

Bridges instantly rattle.

(A. Fet)

Permanent epithet

One of the tropes of folk poetry: a definition word that is consistently combined with one or another defined word and designates in the subject some characteristic, always present generic feature

A good fellow leaves the village,

Old Cossack and Ilya Muromets...
(Bylina “Three trips of Ilya Muromets”)

Simple comparison

A simple type of trope, which is a direct comparison of one object or phenomenon with another according to some characteristic

Road, like a snake's tail,
Full of people, moving...

(A. Pushkin)

Metaphor

Type of trope, transferring the name of one object to another based on their similarity

I do not regret, do not call, do not cry,
Everything will pass as usualwhite apple trees smoke.

(S. Yesenin)

Personification

A special type of metaphor, transferring the image of human traits to inanimate objects or phenomena

The grass withered with pity, and the tree bowed to the ground with grief.

(“The Tale of Igor’s Campaign”)

Hyperbola

A type of trope based on exaggeration of the properties of an object or phenomenon in order to enhance the expressiveness and imagery of artistic speech

And half-asleep shooters are lazy

Tossing and turning on the dial
AND the day lasts longer than a century

And the hug never ends.

(B. Pasternak)

Litotes

A figurative expression that contains an artistic understatement of the properties of an object in order to enhance the emotional impact

Only in the world there is that's shady

Dormant maple tent.

(A. Fet)

Metonymy

Type of trope, transfer of name from one object to another, adjacent (close) to it; artistic identification of objects, concepts, phenomena according to the principle of contiguity

God forbid I go crazy.

No, the staff and the bag are easier;

No, easier work and smoother.

(A. Pushkin)

Synecdoche

A type of metonymy, the replacement of a word or concept with another that is in it in the relationship “less - greater”, “part - whole” (quantitative metonymy)

The lonely sail turns white

In the blue sea fog!..

(M. Lermontov)

Oxymoron

Type of trope, a combination of incongruous words of opposite meanings

I sent you a black rose in a glass

Golden as the sky, ah.

(A. Blok)

Periphrase

Type of trope, replacing the name of an object or phenomenon with a description of its characteristics

And after him, like the noise of a storm,

Another genius rushed away from us,
Anotherruler of our thoughts.

Disappeared, mourned by freedom,

Leaving the world your crown.

Make noise, worry about bad weather:

He was, O sea, your singer.

(A. Pushkin)

Irony

A type of artistic trope, the use of a word or expression in the opposite meaning of what is actually intended, for the purpose of ridicule

“Did you sing everything? this business:

So come and dance!»

(I. Krylov)

Varieties of epithet

Metaphorical

You are my cornflower blue word,
I love you forever.

(S. Yesenin)

Metonymic

Road melancholy, iron

She whistled, breaking my heart...

(A. Blok)

Expanded

(close to paraphrase)

Rhyme, sonorous friend

Inspirational leisure,
Inspirational work!..

(A. Pushkin)

Synonymous series of epithets

Nineteenth century iron,
Truly a cruel age!

(A. Blok)

Paired epithets-antonyms

. ..Receive the collection of colorful heads,
Half funny, half sad,
Common people, ideal
...

(A. Pushkin)

Functions of artistic and expressive means (tropes):

System

Characteristic

Example

Syllabic

A system of versification in which rhythm is created by repeating verses with the same number of syllables, and the arrangement of stressed and unstressed syllables is not ordered; rhyme required

Thunder from one country

Thunder from another country

Vague in the air!

Terrible in the ear!

Clouds were rolling in
Carry the water

The sky was closed

They were filled with fear!

(V. Trediakovsky)

Tonic

A system of versification, the rhythm of which is organized by the repetition of stressed syllables; the number of unstressed syllables between stresses varies freely

The street winds like a snake.

Houses along the snake.

The street is mine.

The houses are mine.

(V. Mayakovsky)

Syllabo-

tonic

A system of versification, which is based on the equalization of the number of syllables, the number and place of stress in poetic lines

Do you want to know what I saw
Free? - Lush fields,
Crowned hills
Trees growing all around
Noisy with a fresh crowd,
Like brothers, dancing in a circle.
(M. Lermontov)

Size

Characteristic

Example

Trochee

A two-syllable foot with stress on the first syllable in the syllabic-tonic system of versification

The Terek howls, wild and angry,
Between the rocky masses,

His cry is like a storm,

Tears fly in splashes.

(M. Lermontov)

Iambic

A two-syllable foot with stress on the second syllable in the syllabic-tonic system of versification

There is a hustle and bustle in the front hall;

Meeting new faces in the living room;

Barking mosek, smacking girls,
Noise, laughter, crush at the threshold...

(A. Pushkin)

Dactyl

Three-syllable foot with stress on the first syllable in the syllabic-tonic system of versification

No matter who calls, I don’t want to

To fussy tenderness

I trade hopelessness

And, closing myself off, I remain silent.

(A. Blok)

Amphibrachium

Three-syllable foot with stress on the second syllable in the syllabic-tonic system of versification

It is not the wind that rages over the forest,
Streams did not run from the mountains -

Moroz the voivode with patrol

Walks around his possessions.

(N. Nekrasov)

Anapaest

Three-syllable foot with stress on the third syllable in the syllabic-tonic system of versification

I will disappear from melancholy and laziness,

Lonely life is not nice
My heart aches, my knees weaken,
In every carnation of fragrant lilac,
A bee crawls in singing.

(A. Fet)

  • RHYME
  • Rhyme (Greek rhythmos - proportionality, rhythm, consistency) - sound repetition in two or more poetic lines, mainly in poetic endings.
  • TYPES OF RHYME
    at the place of the last stressed syllable in the line

Rhyme

Characteristic

Example

Men's

With stress on the last syllable in the line

Am I talking to you?

In the sharp cry of birds of prey,
Am I not looking into your eyes?

From white, matte pages?

(A. Akhmatova)

Women's

With stress on the penultimate syllable in the line

I stopped smiling

The frosty wind chills your lips,

There is one less hope,

There will be one more song.

(A. Akhmatova)

Dactylic

With stress on the second syllable from the end of the line

And Smolenskaya is now the birthday girl,

Blue incense spreads over the grass,

And the singing of a funeral service flows,

Today is not sad, but bright.

(A. Akhmatova)

  • TYPES OF RHYMS
  • according to the consonance of line endings

Rhyme

Description

Example

Cross

ABAB

Whisper, timid breath anye,

Trills of nightingales,

Silver and cola anje

Sleepy Creek...

(A. Fet)

Steam room

AABB

The sun's ray between the linden trees was burning and you juice ,

In front of the bench you drew a brilliant picture juice ,

I gave myself completely to golden dreams Not , -

You didn't answer anything Not .

(A. Fet)

Shingles

(ring)

ABBA

Your luxurious wreath is fresh and fragrant,

All the flowers in it are incense yshny,

Your curls are so abundant and p yshny,

Your luxurious wreath is fresh and fragrant.

(A. Fet)

  • STANZA
  • Stanza - (Greek strophe - circle, turnover) - a group of a certain number of poetic lines repeated in a work, united by a common rhyme and representing a rhythmic-syntactic whole, sharply separated from adjacent poems by a long pause.
  • TYPES OF STROPHES

Stanza

Characteristic

Example

Distich

(couplet)

An independent couplet expressing a complete thought

Good people, you lived peacefully,

They loved their dear daughter dearly.

(N. Nekrasov)

Terza rima

A stanza consisting of three lines connected by a chain of rolling rhymes. An additional final line rhymes with the middle line of the last tercet

ABA - BVB - VGV, etc.

Having completed half my earthly life,
I found myself in a dark forest.

Having lost the right path in the darkness of the valley,

What he was like, oh, I’ll say it.

That wild forest, dense and threatening,

Whose old horror I carry in my memory!

(Dante A. “The Divine Comedy”)

Quatrain

Quatrain, a stanza of four lines; the most common stanza of Russian poetry

You can't understand Russia with your mind,

The general arishnom cannot measure:

She will become special -

You can only believe in Russia.

(F. Tyutchev)

Five verses

A stanza of five poetic lines that rhyme:

ABAAB - ABBBA - AABBA

For the last time your image is cute

I dare to mentally caress,

Awaken your dream with the strength of your heart

And with bliss, timid and sad

Remember your love.

(A. Pushkin)

Sextina

A stanza consisting of six poetic lines rhyming AABVVG or ABABVV

I sit thoughtfully and alone,

On the dying fireplace

I look through my tears -

With sadness I think about the past

And words in my despondency

I can't find it.

(F. Tyutchev)

Seventh line

A stanza consisting of seven poetic lines; practically not used by Russian poets

Bobeobi's lips sang,

Veeomi's eyes sang,
The eyebrows sang,

Lieeey the image was sung,

Gzi-gzi-geo the chain was sung.

So on the canvas there are some correspondences

Outside the extension lived a face.

(V. Khlebnikov)

Octave

A stanza of eight poetic lines with the rhyme ABABABBBV; alternation of masculine and feminine endings is mandatory

Happens

* Lyrical

* Lyrical-satirical

Obol to Charon: I immediately pay tribute

To my enemies. - In reckless courage

I want to write a novel in octaves.

From their harmony, from their wonderful music

I'm crazy; I'll conclude the poem

Measures are difficult within the cramped boundaries.

Let's try, at least our language is free

I'm not used to triple octave chains.

(D. Merezhkovsky)

Nona

A stanza consisting of nine poetic lines, representing an octave with an extended line before the final couplet; used extremely rarely

He came and sat down. I pushed it in with my hand

Faces of a flaming book.

And a month to the crying son

Gives evening stars to the carpet.

“Do I need much?

A loaf of bread

And a drop of milk

Yes this is heaven

Yes, these clouds!

(V. Khlebnikov)

Decimal

A stanza consisting of ten poetic lines

Classical odes of the 18th century

Sonnet

Type of complex stanza; a poem consisting of 14 lines, divided into two quatrains and two tercets; in quatrains only two rhymes are repeated, in terzas - two or three. The arrangement of rhymes allows many variations

One day I spent the whole evening at home.

Out of boredom, I picked up the book and the sonnet opened to me.

I wanted to make poems like this myself.

He took the sheet and began to dirty it without mercy.

I was sweating for half a dozen hours over the attack.

But the attack was difficult - and no matter how hard I rummaged

The boss didn't find it in the archives.

Out of frustration, I groaned, kicked my feet, and got angry.

I approached Phoebus with a poetic plea;

Phoebus immediately sang to me on the golden lyre:

“I’m not receiving guests today.”

I was annoyed - but still there was no sonnet.

“So damn the sonnet!” - I said - and I begin

To write tragedy; and wrote a sonnet.

(I. Dmitriev)

Onegin stanza

A stanza consisting of 14 lines: three quatrains, each of which has its own rhyme (cross, pair, ring) and a final couplet. Created and used by A. Pushkin in the novel “Eugene Onegin”

Always modest, always obedient,
Always cheerful like the morning,
How a poet's life is simple-minded,

How sweet is love's kiss,
Eyes like the sky blue;

Smile, flaxen curls,

Everything in Olga... but any romance

Take it and you will find it, right,

Her portrait: he is very cute,

I used to love him myself,

But he bored me immensely.

Allow me, my reader,
Take care of your older sister.

(A. Pushkin)

Analysis of a lyric work

1. The history of the creation of the lyrical work.

2. Features of the genre of this lyrical work.

3. Ideological and thematic originality of the lyrical work.

4. Features of the lyrical hero of the work.

5. Artistic and expressive means used in the work; their role in revealing the poet's intentions.

6. Lexical means used in the poem; their ideological and artistic significance.


7. Syntactic figures used in the lyrical work; their ideological and artistic role.

8. Phonetic means of expression used in the poem, their role.

9. Poetic size of a lyrical work.

10. The place and role of the work in the context of the poet’s work, in the literary process as a whole.

Episode Analysis

1. The location of this episode in the text of the literary work.

2. The significance of this episode within the framework of the work of art.

3. Episode type.

4. Events depicted in the episode.

5. Characteristics of the characters in the episode.

  • Appearance, clothes.
  • Behavior.
  • Actions of heroes.
  • Speech characteristics of characters.
  • The interaction of the characters in this episode.

6. Artistic, expressive, lexical means used in this episode, their meaning.

7. Features of the use of compositional elements in the episode.

  • Scenery.
  • Diary.
  • Inner monologues.

8. The role of this episode in the context of a holistic literary work.

Analysis of the literary image

1. Type of literary hero.

2. The hero’s place in the system of images and his role in revealing the author’s intention.

3. Typical character of a literary hero; presence or absence of a prototype.

4. Characteristics of a literary hero.

5. Means of creating a literary image.

Landscape functions

Example

Illustrative (creates a background against which various events take place in the work)

This happened in the fall. Gray clouds covered the sky: a cold wind blew from the reaped fields, carrying red and yellow leaves from oncoming trees.I arrived in the village at sunset and stopped at the post office...

(A. Pushkin “The Station Agent”)

Psychological (conveys the internal state of the characters, their experiences)

Looking around, listening, remembering, I suddenly felt uneasy in my heart... raised my eyes to the sky -but there was no peace in the sky either: speckled with stars, it kept stirring, moving, shuddering; I leaned towards the river... but there, and in this dark, cold depth, the stars also swayed and trembled; An alarming revival seemed to me everywhere- and anxiety grew within me.

(I. Turgenev “Asya”)

Lyrical (creates a certain mood for the hero; sets the overall tone of the story)

Below are lush, densely green, flowering meadows, and behind them, along the yellow sands, flows a light river, agitated by the light oars of fishing boats or rustling under the helm of heavy plows., which sail from the most fertile countries of the Russian Empire and provide greedy Moscow with bread.On the other side of the river you can see an oak grove, near which numerous herds graze; there young shepherds, sitting under the shade of trees, sing simple, sad songs...On the left side you can see vast fields covered with grain, fir trees, three or four villages and in the distance the high village of Kolomenskoye with its high palace.

I often come to this place and almost always see spring there; I come there and grieve with nature on the dark days of autumn.

(N. Karamzin “Poor Liza”)

Symbolic (acts as an image-symbol)

In the evenings above the restaurants

The hot air is wild and deaf,
And rules with drunken shouts

Spring and pernicious spirit...

And every evening, behind the barriers,

Breaking the pots,
Walking with the ladies among the ditches

Tested wits.

Rowlocks creak over the lake,

And a woman's squeal is heard,

And in the sky, accustomed to everything,
The disk is bent senselessly.

(A. Blok “Stranger”)

Preview:

Analysis of the final rehearsal essay

according to literature from 13.11. 2017

The final rehearsal essay on literature was completed by all 11th grade students - 10 people, which is 100%. The topics presented to the students reflected all 5 areas of the final essay. As a result, the essay of three students did not meet requirement No. 2 (independent writing of the work), so their work, in general, was not accepted. Typical errors made by students (4 people) in their papers are logical (criterion No. 3). According to criterion No. 4 (literacy), tests were given to everyone, with the exception of Tatyana Sergienko.

Conclusions:

  1. Continue work on preparing for the final essay in five areas.
  2. Work on mistakes made in the work.
  3. Draw students' attention to the conclusions after the example arguments in accordance with the chosen topic.
  4. Rehearse the final essay again, taking into account the corrective work.

Teacher Kachanova O.V.

Preview:

To use the preview, create a Google account and log in to it: https://accounts.google.com I can prove my point of view by referring to works of fiction (journalistic) literature.

For evidence, let us turn (turn) to works of fiction

Reflecting on the fact that..., I can’t help but turn to the work Full Name, in which...

To verify the correctness of the thesis expressed, it is enough to give an example from fiction.

You can easily verify this by turning to fiction

In the work of (name) I found (found) reflection (confirmation) of my thoughts...

Fiction convinces me of the correctness of this point of view.

If the thesis is formulated in the main part, then the “bridges” should be different.

1. To verify the correctness of the thesis expressed, it is enough to give an example from fiction (written in the first paragraph, that is, in the introduction).

2. Each thesis begins:

First, (thesis + argument)

Secondly, (thesis + argument)

1. It is written in the first paragraph, that is, in the introduction:

You can easily verify this by turning to fiction (journalistic) literature.

2. Each thesis begins:

For example , (thesis + argument)

Besides, (thesis + argument)

2. Inside the main part (transition from one argument to another)

Let's remember another work, which also says (raises the question) that...

Another example can be given.

I’ll give one more example to prove my point - this is a work (full name, title)...

As the first argument confirming my idea about..., I will take the work...

As a second argument to prove the thesis I have put forward, I will give a story...

The same topic is discussed in the work...

3. Bond connecting the main part and the conclusion

What conclusion did I come to when reflecting on the topic “...”? I think we need...

And in conclusion I would like to say that...

Concluding my essay, I would like to turn to the words of a famous Russian writer who said: “...”

In conclusion, one cannot help but say about the relevance of the topic raised, which still sounds modern, because...

In conclusion, I would like to encourage people...

To summarize what has been said, I would like to express the hope that

Topic: “Evgeny Karpov “My name is Ivan.” The spiritual fall of the main character"

Goals:


  • educational: familiarization with the text of the story;

  • developing: analysis of the work; characterize the image of the main character who finds himself in a difficult life situation; find out the reasons for the hero’s moral decline;

  • educational: find out the reader’s attitude towards the main character of the story.
^ Lesson progress

  1. Introduction. A word about the writer.
We have already become acquainted with the work of the famous Stavropol writer Evgeny Karpov, whose heroes are different people: young and old, wise with life experience and, on the contrary, beginning to comprehend the science of life. Their destinies are interesting and instructive, the writer’s stories are intriguing and make you think about the difficult destinies of the heroes.

In the world of words and images of the writer Evgeny Karpov, it is light and sunny. What do you like about his works? That they were written by a good person with whom you can argue, disagree in views and tastes, because he assumes a critical attitude towards himself.

Evgeny Vasilyevich Karpov was born in 1919. Until the age of twenty, his peers remained boys; after twenty they left to fight. Having gone through long miles of war, the writer comes to everyday maturity and decides to write about what his generation has done, rising from the soul and ignorance for the future.

Critics have the right to judge the skill and significance of a particular work. But only Time is the best judge in the world. Life dictates the creation of material values. What makes humanity create spiritual values? Evgeny Karpov tries to answer this question in his works.


  1. ^ Reading the story “My name is Ivan.”

  2. Conversation on reading:
-What happened to the hero of the story, a participant in the Great Patriotic War? (Work with text)

(The main character of the story, Semyon Avdeev, a participant in the Great Patriotic War, caught fire in a tank and was seriously injured. He miraculously escaped: blind, with a broken leg, he crawled for two days “one step at a time,” “half a step,” “a centimeter per hour.” And Only on the third day did the sappers take him, barely alive, to the hospital. There, his leg was amputated to the knee, and he also lost his sight.)

How did Ivan feel in the hospital?

(As long as his comrades and caring people were nearby, he forgot about his misfortune. But the time came, and he went out not for a walk, but, as they say, in life. He needed to take care of himself. And then he felt that he was again in "black hole".)

Ivan Avdeev leaves the hospital. How does he meet his new reality without support and help?

(The city began to boil around Semyon and his comrade Leshka Kupriyanov. It was necessary to move on with life.

The doctors did not promise that Semyon’s vision would return, but he so hoped to wake up one day and see “the sun, the grass, the ladybug” again.

^ Lyoshka also had unkind traces of the war: “he was missing his right arm and three ribs.”

The comrades were left alone with reality, and very soon they ate, and even more, drank away their small funds. They decided to go to the Moscow region, to Lyoshka’s homeland. But Semyon had his own house, garden, mother. But it’s all as if it was left in a past life that cannot be returned.)

(But there was a time: Semyon was a hooligan, a fighting boy, who often received a belt from his father. And his mother... She did not scold her son for mischief and said: “He will be a breadwinner.” He did not turn out to be a breadwinner.)

What path do Semyon and Lenka Kupriyanov choose?

(They start begging. “Brothers and sisters, help the unfortunate cripples...”

With these words, Semyon and Lyoshka entered the carriage, and coins began to fall into the outstretched cap. At first Semyon shivered from this “clanging”; he tried to hide his blind eyes.

^ But the experience turned out to be successful, and the friends made good money. Lyoshka was pleased, but Semyon wanted to quickly get drunk and forget.

And they drank again, then they danced to the accordion, bawled songs, and Semyon first cried, and then forgot.)

Did fate give them a chance upon arrival in Moscow to choose a different path in life?

(Upon arrival in Moscow, Lyoshka refused to go to the artel - it was much easier to beg.

Semyon went to the Home for the Invalids, even worked one day in a workshop where “the presses were clapping, dry and annoying.” The workers sat down to dinner, and in the evening they will all go home. “There they are waiting, there they are dear.” And Semyon wanted warmth and affection, but, as he believed, it was too late to go to his mother.

^ The next day he didn’t go to work, because in the evening a drunk Lyoshka and his company came, and everything started spinning again. And soon Lyoshka’s house turned into a hangout.)

What was the fate of Semyon's mother?

(And at that time, Semyon’s mother, aged, having lost her husband and son, raised her niece, continued to live, take care of her grandchildren and moved to live in Moscow.

One day she heard a voice that was so familiar. I was afraid to turn in the direction from which it was coming: “Senka.” The mother went to meet her son, she put her hands on his shoulders. "The blind man fell silent." Feeling the woman’s hands, he turned pale and wanted to say something.

“Senya,” the woman said quietly.

“My name is Ivan,” said Semyon and quickly moved on.)

Why didn’t Semyon admit to his mother that it was him?

What feelings do you have towards the hero of the story?

What broke Semyon and his comrade, people who went through the war?

^ Homework : Talk about the problem raised in the story “My name is Ivan.”

LESSON #8

Topic: “The image of the mother in the works of I. Chumak “Mother”, “Herods”, “Strange”

Goals:


  • educational: introduce students to the works of I. Chumak;

  • developing: to reveal the greatness of the image of the mother in the works being studied; give the concept of the expressions “maternal feeling”, “maternal heart”; develop monologue speech;

  • educational: show the generosity, forgiveness of the mother, the ability to sympathize with people even in the most difficult moment of life, not lose the presence of mind, instill respect for the woman-mother.
^ Lesson progress

  1. A word about the writer.
Ilya Vasilyevich Chumakov (Chumak - that’s how he signed his works) did not belong to that kind of writers who can and do write about anything without leaving their comfortable apartments and using as material for weighty books what they read from other books , newspapers and magazines, heard on the radio or from a taxi driver.

At the heart of everything he wrote is a genuine knowledge of life and people. The brief annotation to the writer’s last lifetime book, “Living Placers,” says: “This is a collection of short stories - short stories. There is not a single line of fiction in the story. Everything was either experienced by the author himself or seen with his own eyes.”

Ilya Chumak was a strict realist, but he did not copy reality. His works are characterized by artistic generalization, making real life phenomena more colorful and brighter.

What attracted Ilya Chumak as a writer? He was a heroic writer.

Ilya Chumak, both as a writer and as a person, had a harsh, but at the same time kind character. He was kind and open-hearted towards those whom he saw in useful activities for the benefit of the Motherland.


  1. ^ Working on the topic of the lesson.
Have you noticed the topic of today's lesson? We will talk about mothers, or rather about mothers. For every person this word is sacred. People sometimes don’t think about why they love their mothers, they just love them and that’s it. They don’t even think about how easy it is for mothers to raise their children. How worried they are about their children, how much strength and energy they give to them. Do mothers always feel gratitude from their children, do they always get what they deserve in life? Let's get acquainted with the works of I. Chumak and together with you we will try to answer these questions.

  1. ^ Reading and discussion of the story "Mother":
- What brought Maria Ivanovna to the house of Grunya’s daughter? (Son’s departure to the front and loneliness, desire to find solace).

Why did Maria Ivanovna, having received the first letter from her son, fall ill? (She lived next door to the airfield, and it was incomprehensibly scary for her to look at the turns and loops that the pilots made, because her son was also a pilot, and even fought.)

How do you understand Marya Ivanovna’s words: “When you become a mother, you will understand everything.” (Even though the news from the son was good, the mother's heart was restless.)

Why didn’t Maria Ivanovna rise to meet the postman? Has she stopped waiting for letters? (No. Her maternal feeling told her that the postman would not bring her letters.)

What else told her that something irreparable had happened? (Daughter's eyes).

How did Maria Ivanovna try to console her grief? (She knitted socks and warm mittens. And she knitted so many that it turned out to be a whole parcel).

How did the mother behave when she heard a message from her daughter that her son had died? (“The old woman did not stagger, did not scream, did not clutch her heart. She just sighed heavily.”)

So why did the mother continue to knit, knowing that her son had died? (She is a mother. And the fighters who defended their homeland from the enemy were as dear to her as her own son, they were also someone’s sons. And having lost her son, she realized how close they were to her.)

What conclusion can be drawn after reading this story? (How much kindness and warmth there is in a mother’s heart, how much courage and love there is in it.)


  1. ^ Reading and discussion of the story “Herods”:
-The next short story that we will get acquainted with is called “Herods”. Explain the meaning of the word "Herods". (Herods are cruel people).

What offended Praskovya Ivanovna in her relationship with her sons? (When I raised them, I struggled with my widow’s lot with all my might, and they, my sons, when they became adults, forgot about their mother and did not help her.)

Why didn’t Praskovya Ivanovna sue the children for “a year, two, or maybe even ten”? (These were her children, she felt sorry for them, she thought that they themselves would think of helping their mother).

What decision did the court make? (The children had to send their mother 15 rubles a month).

How did Praskovya Ivanovna react to the court’s decision and why? (She began to cry and called the judges Herods, because their decision, in her opinion, was cruel to her sons. No matter how they treated their mother, they were her children. And the mother’s heart trembled when she heard the verdict. She already, She probably forgave her unlucky sons. After all, mothers are always ready to forgive and protect their children, the most precious thing they have.)

What is the main idea of ​​the novella? (A mother loves and is ready to forgive her children, to protect them from those who, as it seems to her, offend them. This special feeling is maternal love, all-forgiving love.)


  1. ^ Reading and discussion of the story “Strange”:
- What happened to Masha, who lost her son? How does the author describe her condition and appearance? (“From constant tears she turned into a decrepit old woman. She did not want to live when she lost her only son, her joy and hope”)

Who decided to visit their grief-stricken mother? (The old woman who heard about her grief.)

What did Ivan Timofeevich feel when he heard from a strange, unfamiliar old woman about the decision to go to his wife? (He was worried that the old woman would unsettle Masha’s heart even more with her consolation.)

What could two mothers talk about? (About her grief, about losing her sons. Only Masha lost one son, and the old woman received funerals for her seven sons. About the fact that you need to live, no matter what).

Why is the story called "Strange"? (She was strange, probably, because she consoled a stranger, because she understood that she could console, because she experienced seven times greater grief and well understood the suffering of this woman.)


  1. ^ Summing up the lesson:
- What qualities did I. Chumak endow with his heroines? (Courage, love for your children, maternal instinct, forgiveness, sincere and selfless love, devotion to your children. A mother’s heart and a mother’s destiny are special concepts.)

And the question involuntarily arises: “Do we take care of our mothers? Do we give them as much love and attention as they give to us, the children, whom we love endlessly?” It’s worth thinking about this in order to upset our only mothers less.

^ Homework: write an essay on the topic: “The image of the mother in the works of I. Chumak.”

LESSON #9

Topic: "V. Butenko "The Year of the Wasp". Relationships between "fathers" and "children"

Goals:


  • educational: introduce students to the story; determine the main idea of ​​the work; explore the age-old problem of relationships between representatives of different generations;

  • developing: develop the ability to analyze a work, draw conclusions;

  • educational: instill a caring attitude towards parents, sincerity and a true sense of kindness.
During the classes

  1. Org moment.

  2. Reading and analysis of V. Butenko’s story “The Year of the Wasp.”
Questions for discussion:

What impression did the story make on you?

Who does Evtrop Lukich live with? (He lives alone, but he has a son and daughter who live separately from their father. His loneliness is shared by his neighbor and friend Kupriyan and the cat.)

How is life for Evtrop Lukic? (“The day was over, a fresh evening came, he sat with his friend Kupriyan, talking about life. When the neighbor left, grandfather Eutrop trudged into his courtyard, dined in the temporary hut with the cat, listened to “Latest News.” Having found out the weather for tomorrow, The old man sat down to smoke. Lost in thought and lowered his hands with the cigarette to the very ground, and then wiped the cigarette butt with the toe of his shoe, he went to sleep under the canopy.")

What was Evtrop Lukich thinking about, “lowering his hand with the cigarette to the very ground”? (Most likely, he was thinking about the life he had lived, about his loneliness in old age, although he had a son and daughter).

What can you say about the son of Eutrop Lukich? (He lives in the city and does not want to return to his father in the village. He has a three-room apartment with all amenities, and has a family.)

What proposal does Vasily come to his father with? (He persuades Evtrop Lukich to move to live with him in the city, where there is a good park, cinema, dancing, “doctors are first class.”)

Does the father agree to go to his son? Why? (No. Lukich is used to living on the land, working on the farm, the land. He likes to drink well water and eat fruits that he grew himself. Lukich has everything: his own honey and tobacco. And as long as he has the strength, he wants to live in his own house , in his village.

^ The grandfather gave the gift to the city, walked his son to the alley and smiled uncertainly. He promised to think about moving.)

What did Kupriyan tell Evtrop Lukich when he found out why Vasily came? (He told the story of another single father who went to visit his son in Stavropol.)

How did his relatives treat the old man? (They greeted him unfriendly, put him to bed on a “lame” cot, the son didn’t even have anything to talk about with his father, “stared at the TV.” The grandfather got ready and went to his village.)

What conclusion did Kupriyan and grandfather Lukich make? (“Blood is the same, but life is different.”)

How do you understand this expression? (Children who have grown up have their own lives, especially if they live in the city. They are cut off from the land, from their roots and no longer need their parents.)

So why did the son of Eutrop Lukich actually come? (He needs money, the line for the Zhiguli is approaching, but there is no money. There is a way out: to sell his father’s house and take him with him.)

What is the main idea of ​​the story? (It is not out of a sense of filial duty that the son calls his father to live with him, it is not a feeling of compassion that drives him, the reason is obvious - the need for money.)

What is your attitude to the problem raised in the story?


  1. Generalization.
It seems to me that V. Butenko’s story “The Year of the Wasp” did not leave you indifferent, because the topic of relations between people of different generations is always relevant. The most important thing is that each of you understands how much the elderly and children need sincere care for them, a kind word, because everything is “returning to normal.”

^ Homework: write an essay - a reflection on the topic: "And the tears of old people are a reproach for us."

LESSON #10

Topic: “Ian Bernard “The Peaks of Pyatigorye.” Admiration for the beauty of our native nature"

^ Goals:


  • educational: introduce students to the author’s poetic works;

  • developing: continue work on developing the ability to analyze a poetic work, convey the feelings and moods of the author;

  • educational: instill love for one’s native land, native land.
Epigraph:

My peaks of Pyatigorye

And my priceless cities.

Here from the first to the last dawn I

I painted your creations.

Ian Bernard

^ Lesson progress


  1. Org moment.

  2. A word about the author
Jan Ignatievich Bernard was born in Warsaw, into the family of a Polish communist underground worker. When the Nazis occupied Poland, the father and two young children emigrated to the Soviet Union. His wife was lost during the bombing.

When the Great Patriotic War ended, Ignat Bernard joined the Red Army as a soldier in a construction battalion and begged the commander to leave his sons with him.

Jacek and Stasik became children of the battalion. The Bernard family remained in their second homeland.

Now Jan Bernard lives in Stavropol. He carries out social work and continues his creativity.

In the preface to the collection “The Peaks of Pyatigorye”, Jan Bernard wrote: “I have been circling around Stavropol for more than twelve years. And only now, having become gray-haired, I realized: it is impossible to part with Stavropol - it is beyond my strength! Thank you, Lord, for your Light, thank you!”

Jan Bernard cherishes the landscapes of Stavropol, meetings with noble readers who “cryed and laughed to tears” at the author’s poetry concerts.


  1. ^ Reading and analysis of the poems of Jan Bernard.
"Alone"(teacher reads)

Mashuk, cut off by the fog,

Airy in a cloudy window.

In some places the forest is black like soot

In the milky depths there is a shadow.

Already dressed in chain mail,

I cut through the steepness.

And you, surprised by the landscape,

You are silent with the mountain alone.

What are you thinking about intensely?

Rocks stroking the hump,

How long have you been wandering in green paradise?

Along the lace of June trails?

Now you look fascinated

Like a branch falling into a snowdrift.

It is not without reason that I wanted to start a conversation about the works of Jan Bernard with this poem. It contains so much lyricism and admiration for one of the most famous mountains of Pyatigorsk - Mashuk. Mashuk is in the fog, it is airy, its peaks are covered with snow, and the author prefers to contemplate such beauty in private, “stroking the hump of the rock.” What can delight you in a cold winter landscape? Probably, the fact that quite recently the poet wandered “along the lace of June paths”, and now his eye is captivated by the cold, frozen beauty, dressed as if in chain mail.

In the poem, the author uses epithets and metaphors that convey the mood of meeting the winter landscape of Mashuk. This is not the only poem that is dedicated to Mashuk. And each one is like a pearl of a precious necklace.

We turn the page of the collection and here is a dedication to Mount Zheleznaya.

"The Beauty of God"(read by student)

Around the healing mountain Zheleznaya,

Along the circular forest alley

A walk through the wilderness of heaven

Sweeter than any earthly bliss.

Oh, how many times have I been under a sheer cliff

The holy birds sang wonderfully.

In the grip of mental and physical pain

I suddenly became lighter.

And he was already like a sailboat,

And the maple looked like a mast

And I sailed on the high-brow waves

And again I loom in the greenery.

From the feelings that surged in the native thicket,

I cry before the Beauty of the Lord.

The author calls Iron Mountain healing, i.e. healing, healing wounds, because at its foot there are springs of “living” water, generously donated by the earth. And these springs heal not only physical pain, but also mental pain, because the holy birds sing wonderfully.

What does the poet compare the cliff to and why? What feelings does he experience when looking at Mount Zheleznaya?

(The poet compares the cliff with a sailboat, the maple with a mast, and one can imagine how the author floats away “on the high-brow waves” into the “Beauty of the Lord.” And tears of joy fill his soul, and it (the soul) is brighter from the beauty of earthly and unearthly. )

"A moment of bloom"(read by student)

I looked - what a beauty, -

Will it really be perishable?

Pure, like a child's dream -

The light is extraordinary.

The Lord himself kissed me on the mouth,

And he named her Elena.

And in the eyes the height shines,

And the spring of the Universe itself.

God! Give the poet words

To sing your Creation,

And so that blue sparkles in them,

And they did not know decay

However, even the leaves of the stars wither,

But the moment of blossoming is eternal.

In this poem one can feel the author’s delight at the moment of flowering, which is pure, “like a child’s dream.” The author again turns to the Lord, because this is his creation, which will not decay, it is eternal - “a moment of flowering.”

Jan Bernard's poems are dedicated not only to nature, its beauty at different times of the year. There are declarations of love to friends and dreams dear to the heart.

"Old Street"(read by student)

On a quiet old street

Almost deserted, like in a dream.

It's like I met a painting

Familiar to me a long time ago.

Here the cloud hangs like an avalanche

On par with a tall tower,

Another white ballerina

It melts in the green depths.

The houses are silent. And the dog is silent

He barely looked over me.

The roof is staining in the attic

Keeping my palette of eyelids,

The trees are wrapped up as if

The mysterious flicker of the day.

Find epithets and personifications in the text. What is their significance?


  1. Summary:
- How does the author relate to his native nature?

What fascinates him?

What is the mood of his poems?

How do you feel when reading the poet's poems?

Homework: prepare an expressive reading and analysis of any poem by the poet.

At the very end of the war, the Germans set fire to the tank in which Semyon Avdeev was a turret shooter.
For two days, blind, burned, with a broken leg, Semyon crawled among some ruins. It seemed to him that the blast wave had thrown him out of the tank into a deep hole.
For two days, one step at a time, half a step, a centimeter per hour, he climbed out of this smoky pit towards the sun, into the fresh wind, dragging his broken leg, often losing consciousness. On the third day, sappers found him, barely alive, in the ruins of an ancient castle. And for a long time the surprised sappers wondered how the wounded tanker could have gotten to this useless ruin...
In the hospital, Semyon’s leg was amputated up to the knee and then they took him to famous professors for a long time so that they could restore his sight.
But nothing came of it...
While Semyon was surrounded by comrades, cripples just like him, while a smart, kind doctor was next to him, while nurses cared for him, he somehow forgot about his injury, he lived like everyone else lives. Behind the laughter, behind the joke, I forgot my grief.
But when Semyon left the hospital onto the city street - not for a walk, but completely, into life, he suddenly felt the whole world was completely different from the one that surrounded him yesterday, the day before yesterday and his entire past life.
Although Semyon was told a few weeks ago that his vision would not return, he still harbored hope in his heart. And now everything has collapsed. It seemed to Semyon that he again found himself in that black pit where the blast wave had thrown him. Only then did he passionately want to get out into the fresh wind, towards the sun, he believed that he would get out, but now he did not have that confidence. Anxiety crept into my heart. The city was incredibly noisy, and the sounds were somehow elastic, and it seemed to him that if he took even one step forward, these elastic sounds would throw him back, hurt him painfully against the stones.
Behind the hospital. Along with everyone else, Semyon scolded him for his boredom, wondered how to get out of it, and now he suddenly became so dear, so necessary. But you can’t go back there, even though it’s still very close. We have to go forward, but it’s scary. Afraid of the seething cramped city, but most of all afraid of himself:
Leshka Kupriyanov brought Semyon out of his stupor.
- Oh, and the weather! Now I just want to go for a walk with the girl! Yes, in the field, yes, collect flowers, and run.
I like to fool around. Let's go! What are you up to?
They went.
Semyon heard how the prosthesis creaked and slammed, how Leshka breathed heavily and whistling. These were the only familiar, close sounds, and the clanging of trams, the screams of cars, the laughter of children seemed alien, cold. They parted in front of him and ran around. The stones of the pavement and some pillars got in the way underfoot and made it difficult to walk.
Semyon knew Leshka for about a year. Small in stature, it often served him as a crutch. It used to be that Semyon would lie on the bed and shout: “Nanny, give me a crutch,” and Leshka would run up and squeak, fooling around:
- I'm here, Count. Give me your whitest pen. Place it, Most Serene One, on my unworthy shoulder.
So they walked around hugging each other. Semyon knew Leshka's round, armless shoulder and faceted, cropped head well by touch. And now he put his hand on Leshka’s shoulder and his soul immediately felt calmer.
They spent the whole night, first in the dining room, and then in the restaurant at the station. When they went to the dining room, Leshka said that they would drink a hundred grams, have a good dinner and leave on the night train. We drank as agreed. Leshka suggested repeating it. Semyon did not refuse, although he rarely drank at all. Vodka flowed surprisingly easily today. The hops were pleasant, did not stupefy the head, but awakened good thoughts in it. True, it was impossible to concentrate on them. They were nimble and slippery, like fish, and, like fish, they slipped out and disappeared into the dark distance. This made my heart feel sad, but the sadness did not linger long. It was replaced by memories or naive but pleasant fantasies. It seemed to Semyon that one morning he would wake up and see the sun, grass, and a ladybug. And then suddenly a girl appeared. He clearly saw the color of her eyes, hair, and felt her tender cheeks. This girl fell in love with him, with the blind man. They talked a lot about these people in the ward and even read a book out loud.
Leshka was missing his right arm and three ribs. The war, as he said with a laugh, cut him to pieces. In addition, he was wounded in the neck. After the throat operation, he spoke intermittently, with a hiss, but Semyon got used to these sounds, which bear little resemblance to human sounds. They irritated him less than the accordion players playing a waltz, than the flirtatious cooing of the woman at the next table.
From the very beginning, as soon as wine and appetizers began to be served on the table, Leshka chatted merrily and laughed contentedly:
- Eh, Senka, I love nothing in the world more than a well-cleaned table! I love to have fun - especially to eat! Before the war, we used to go to Bear Lakes with the whole plant in the summer. Brass band and buffets! And I am with an accordion. There is company under every bush, and in every company I, like Sadko, am a welcome guest. “Stretch it, Alexey Svet-Nikolaevich.” Why not stretch it out if they ask and the wine is already poured. And some blue-eyed woman brings ham on a fork...
They drank, ate, and sipped, savoring, cold thick beer. Leshka continued to talk enthusiastically about his Moscow region. His sister lives there in her own house. She works as a technician at a chemical plant. The sister, as Leshka assured, would definitely fall in love with Semyon. They will get married. Then they will have children. The children will have as many toys as they want and whatever they want. Semyon will make them himself in the artel where they will work.
Soon it became difficult for Leshka to speak: he was tired, and it seemed that he stopped believing in what he was talking about. They were silent more, they drank more...
Semyon remembers how Leshka wheezed: “We are lost people, it would be better if they killed us completely.” He remembers how heavier his head became, how dark it became - the bright visions disappeared. The cheerful voices and music completely drove him crazy. I wanted to beat everyone, to smash them, Leshka hissed:
- Don't go home. Who needs you like that?
Home? Where is the house? A long, long time ago, maybe
a hundred years ago he had a house. And there was a garden, and a birdhouse on a birch tree, and rabbits. Small, with red eyes, they trustingly jumped towards him, sniffed his boots, and moved their pink nostrils funny. Mother... Semyon was called an “anarchist” because, although he studied well at school, he desperately hooliganized, smoked, and because he and his gang staged merciless raids on gardens and vegetable gardens. And she, the mother, never scolded him. The father spanked mercilessly, and the mother only timidly asked not to misbehave. She herself gave money for cigarettes and did her best to hide Semyonov’s tricks from her father. Semyon loved his mother and helped her in everything: chopping wood, carrying water, cleaning the cowshed. The neighbors were jealous of Anna Filippovna, seeing how deftly her son managed the housework,
“There will be a breadwinner,” they said, “and the seventeenth water will wash away the boyish nonsense.”
Drunk Semyon remembered this word - “breadwinner” - and repeated it to himself, gritting his teeth so as not to cry. What kind of breadwinner is he now? A collar around the mother's neck.
The comrades saw how Semyon’s tank was burning, but no one saw how Semyon got out of it. The mother was sent a notice that her son had died. And now Semyon was wondering whether it was worth reminding her of her worthless life? Is it worth stirring up her tired, broken heart with new pain?
A drunken woman was laughing nearby. Leshka kissed her with wet lips and hissed something incomprehensible. Dishes rattled, the table overturned, and the earth turned over.
We woke up in a woodshed at a restaurant. Someone caring spread straw for them and gave them two old blankets. All the money has been spent on drink, the requirements for tickets have been lost, and it’s a six-day drive to Moscow. To go to the hospital and say that they had been robbed was not enough of a conscience.
Leshka offered to travel without tickets, in the position of beggars. Semyon was even scared to think about it. He suffered for a long time, but there was nothing to do. We need to go, we need to eat. Semyon agreed to walk along the carriages, but he would not say anything, he would pretend to be dumb.



We entered the carriage. Leshka began his speech smartly in his hoarse voice:
- Brothers and sisters, help the unfortunate cripples...
Semyon walked bent over, as if through a cramped black dungeon. It seemed to him that sharp stones were hanging over his head. A roar of voices could be heard from afar, but as soon as he and Leshka approached, this hum disappeared, and Semyon heard only Leshka and the jingling of coins in his cap. This tinkling made Semyon shiver. He lowered his head lower, hiding his eyes, forgetting that they were blind and could not see reproach, anger, or regret.
The further they walked, the more unbearable Leshka’s crying voice became for Semyon. It was stuffy in the carriages. There was absolutely no way to breathe, when suddenly, from the open window, a fragrant, meadow wind blew into his face, and Semyon was frightened by it, recoiled, and hurt his head painfully on the shelf.
We walked the entire train, collected more than two hundred rubles and got off at the station for lunch. Leshka was pleased with his first success and spoke boastfully about his lucky “planid”. Semyon wanted to cut Leshka off, to hit him, but even more he wanted to get drunk quickly and get rid of himself.
We drank three-star cognac, snacked on crabs and cakes, since there was nothing else in the buffet.
Having gotten drunk, Leshka found friends in the neighborhood, danced with them to the accordion, and bawled songs. Semyon first cried, then somehow he forgot, began to stomp his feet, and then sing along, clap his hands, and finally sang:
But we don’t sow, and we don’t plow, But an ace, an eight, and a jack, And from prison we wave a handkerchief, Four on the side - and yours are gone...,
...They were again left without a penny of money at someone else's distant station.
It took the friends a whole month to get to Moscow. Leshka became so comfortable with begging that sometimes he even made fun of himself, singing vulgar jokes. Semyon no longer felt remorse. He reasoned simply: he needed money to get to Moscow - he shouldn’t steal, right? And when they get drunk, it’s temporary. He will come to Moscow, get a job in an artel and take his mother with him, he will definitely take her and maybe even get married. Well, if other cripples have the good fortune, it will happen to him too...
Semyon sang front-line songs. He behaved confidently, proudly raising his head with dead eyes, shaking his long, thick hair to the beat of the song. And it turned out that he was not asking for alms, but was condescendingly taking the reward due to him. His voice was good, his songs were soulful, and the passengers generously gave to the blind singer.
The passengers especially liked the song, which told about how a soldier was quietly dying in a green meadow, an old birch tree bent over him. She extended her branch-like arms to the soldier, like a mother. The fighter tells the birch tree that his mother and girlfriend are waiting for him in a distant village, but he will not come to them, because he is “betrothed to the white birch tree forever,” and that she is now his “bride and his own mother.” In conclusion, the soldier asks: “Sing, my birch, sing, my bride, about the living, about the kind, about people in love - I will sleep sweetly to this song.”
It happened that in another carriage Semyon was asked to sing this song several times. Then they took with them in their caps not only silver, but also a bunch of paper money.
Upon arrival in Moscow, Leshka flatly refused to join the artel. Wandering on electric trains, as he said, is not a dusty job and it doesn’t cost money. My only concern is to evade the policeman. True, this was not always possible. Then he was sent to a nursing home, but he safely escaped from there the next day.
Semyon also visited the home for the disabled. Well, he said, it’s nourishing and cozy, there’s good supervision, the artists come, but everything seems like you’re sitting buried in a mass grave. I was also in the artel. “They took it like something they don’t know where to put, and put it next to the machine.” The whole day he sat and splashed - he stamped some tins. From right and left the press clapped, dryly, annoyingly. An iron box rattled across the concrete floor, in which blanks were dragged in and finished parts were pulled away. The old man who was carrying this box approached Semyon several times and whispered, breathing in the fumes of tobacco:
- You’re here for a day, sit for another, and then ask for another job. At least for a break. You'll make money there. And here the work is hard,” and the earnings are barely... Don’t be silent, but step on the throat, otherwise... It would be best to take a liter and drink it with the foreman. He would then give you money for the work. Our foreman is a good guy .
Semyon listened to the angry talk of the workshop, the teachings of the old man and thought that he was not needed here at all, and everything here was alien to him. He felt his restlessness especially clearly during lunch.
The cars fell silent. People could be heard talking and laughing. They sat on workbenches, on boxes, untied their bundles, rattling pots, rustling paper. It smelled like homemade pickles and garlic cutlets. Early in the morning these bundles were collected by the hands of mothers or wives. The working day will end, and all these people will go home. There they are waiting, there they are dear. And he? Who cares about him? No one will even take you to the dining room if you sit without lunch. And so Semyon wanted the warmth of home, someone’s affection... Go to his mother? “No, it’s too late now. Let it all go to waste."
“Comrade,” someone touched Semyon on the shoulder. “Why did you hug the stamp?” Come and eat with us.
Semyon shook his head negatively.
- Well, as you wish, otherwise let's go. Don't blame me.
It always happens again, and then you get used to it.
Semyon would have gone home at that very moment, but he didn’t know the way. Leshka brought him to work and in the evening he was supposed to come pick him up. But he didn't come. Semyon waited for him for a whole hour. The shift watchman escorted him home.
My arms hurt because I was not used to it, my back was breaking. Without washing or having dinner, Semyon went to bed and fell into a heavy, troubled sleep. Leshka woke up. He came drunk, with a drunk company, with bottles of vodka. Semyon began to drink greedily...
The next day I didn’t go to work. We walked around the carriages again.
A long time ago, Semyon stopped thinking about his life, stopped being upset about his blindness, and lived as God dictated. He sang badly: his voice was strained. Instead of songs, it turned out to be a continuous scream. He did not have the same confidence in his gait, pride in the manner of holding his head, all that remained was arrogance. But generous Muscovites still donated, so there was a lot of money from friends.
After several scandals, Leshka’s sister left for an apartment. A beautiful house with carved windows turned into a hangout.
Anna Filippovna has aged a lot in recent years. During the war, my husband died somewhere while digging trenches. The news of her son’s death completely knocked her down; she thought she wouldn’t get up, but somehow everything worked out. After the war, her niece Shura came to her (she had just graduated from college at that time and got married), came and said: “Why, auntie, are you going to live here as an orphan, sell your hut and let’s come to me.” The neighbors condemned Anna Filippovna, saying that the most important thing for a person is to have his own corner. No matter what happens, keep your house and live neither damned nor crumpled. Otherwise, you sell the house, the money will fly by, and then who knows how it will turn out.
It may be that what people said was true, but the niece got used to Anna Filippovna from an early age, treated her like her own mother, and sometimes lived with her for several years, because they did not get along with their stepmother. In a word, Anna Filippovna made up her mind. She sold the house and went to Shura, lived for four years and didn’t complain. And she really liked Moscow.
Today she went to see the dacha that the young couple had rented for the summer. She liked the dacha: a garden, a small vegetable garden.
Thinking that today she needed to mend the boys’ old shirts and pants for the village, she heard a song. In some ways it was familiar to her, but in what ways she couldn’t understand. Then I realized - a voice! She understood and shuddered and turned pale.
For a long time I did not dare to look in that direction, I was afraid that the painfully familiar voice would disappear. And yet I looked. I looked... Senka!
The mother, as if blind, stretched out her hands and walked towards her son. Now she is already next to him, putting her hands on his shoulders. And Senkina’s shoulders, with sharp little bumps. I wanted to call my son by name but couldn’t - there was no air in my chest and I didn’t have enough strength to breathe.
The blind man fell silent. He felt the woman's hands and became wary.
The passengers saw how the beggar turned pale, how he wanted to say something and could not - he suffocated. The passengers saw how the blind man put his hand on the woman’s hair and immediately pulled it back.
“Senya,” the woman said quietly and weakly.
The passengers stood up and waited with trepidation for his answer.
At first the blind man only moved his lips, and then said dully:
- Citizen, you are mistaken. My name is Ivan.
“What!” exclaimed the mother. “Senya, what are you doing?!” The blind man pushed her aside and with a quick, uneven gait
he moved on and didn’t sing anymore.
The passengers saw how the woman looked after the beggar and whispered: “He, he.” There were no tears in her eyes, only prayer and suffering. Then they disappeared, leaving anger. The terrible anger of an insulted mother...
She lay in a severe faint on the sofa. An elderly man, probably a doctor, leaned over her. The passengers asked each other in a whisper to disperse, to give access to fresh air, but did not disperse.
“Maybe I was mistaken?” someone asked hesitantly.
“Mother will not be mistaken,” answered the gray-haired woman,
- So why didn’t he confess?
- How can you confess to someone like that?
- Silly...
A few minutes later Semyon came in and asked:
- Where is my mother?
“You no longer have a mother,” the doctor answered.
The wheels were knocking. For a minute Semyon seemed to see the light, saw the people, was afraid of them and began to back away. The cap fell out of his hands; the little things crumbled and rolled across the floor, clinking coldly and uselessly...


German Sadulaev

VICTORY DAY

Old people sleep little. In youth, time seems like an irredeemable ruble; the time of an elderly person is copper change. Wrinkled hands carefully put them in piles minute by minute, hour by hour, day by day: how much is left? Sorry every night.

He woke up at half past five. There was no need to get up so early. Even if he had not gotten out of bed at all, and sooner or later this was bound to happen, no one would have noticed. He might not get up at all. Especially so early. In recent years, he increasingly wanted to not wake up one day. But not today. Today was a special day.

Alexey Pavlovich Rodin got up from the old creaking bed in a one-room apartment on the street... in old Tallinn, went to the toilet, relieved his bladder. I began to clean myself up in the bathroom. He washed his face, brushed his teeth, and spent a long time scraping the stubble from his chin and cheeks with a well-worn razor. Then he washed his face again, rinsing off the remaining soap suds, and refreshed his face with aftershave lotion.

Walking into the room, Rodin stood in front of a wardrobe with a cracked mirror. The mirror reflected his worn body with old scars, dressed in faded shorts and a T-shirt. Rodin opened the closet door and changed his underwear. For a couple more minutes he looked at his ceremonial jacket with medals of the order. Then he took out the shirt he had ironed the day before and put on his uniform.

It was as if twenty years had been lifted from my shoulders. In the dim light of the chandelier, dimmed by time, the captain's shoulder straps burned brightly.

Already at eight o'clock Rodin met at the front door of his house with another veteran, Vakha Sultanovich Aslanov. Together with Vakha, they went through half the war, in the same reconnaissance company of the First Belorussian Front. By 1944, Vakha was already a senior sergeant and had a medal “For Courage.” When the news came about the eviction of the Chechens, Vakha was in the hospital after being wounded. He was immediately transferred from the hospital to a penal battalion. Without guilt, based on nationality. Rodin, then a senior lieutenant, went to his superiors and asked to return Vakha. The intercession of the company commander did not help. Vakha ended the war in a penal battalion and immediately after demobilization he was sent to settle in Kazakhstan.

Rodin was demobilized in 1946, with the rank of captain, and was assigned to serve in Tallinn, as an instructor in the city party committee.

Back then, there was only one "n" in the name of this city, but my computer has a new spell checker, I will write Tallinn with two "l" and two "n" so that the text editor does not swear and underline this word with a red wavy line .

After the rehabilitation of the Chechens in 1957, Rodin found his front-line comrade. He made requests, taking advantage of his official position - by this time Rodin was already the head of the department. Rodin managed to do more than just find Vakha, he got him a call to Tallinn, found him a job, helped him with an apartment and registration. Vakha has arrived. Rodin, starting his efforts, was afraid that Vakha would not want to leave his native land. He made sure that Vakha could transport his family.

But Vakha came alone. He had no one to transport. The wife and child died during the eviction. They fell ill with typhus in a freight car and died suddenly. Parents died in Kazakhstan. Vakha has no close relatives left. This is probably why it was easy for him to leave Chechnya.

Then there was... life. Life?.. probably, then there was the whole life. There was good and bad in her. True, a whole life. After all, sixty years have passed. A full sixty years have passed since the end of that war.

Yes, it was a special day. Sixtieth anniversary of the victory.

Sixty years is a lifetime. Even more. For those who did not return from the war, who remained twenty years old, this is three lives. It seemed to Rodin that he was living these lives for those who did not return. No, this is not just a metaphor. Sometimes he thought: these twenty years I have been living for Sergeant Savelyev, who was blown up by a mine. For the next twenty years I will live for Private Talgatov, who died in the first battle. Then Rodin thought: no, I won’t have much time. Better yet, ten years. After all, living to thirty is no longer so bad. Then I will have time to live for three more of my dead soldiers.

Yes, sixty years is a long time! A whole life or six makeweights to the cut short lives of dead soldiers.

And yet this is... if not less, then probably the same as four years of war.

I don't know how to explain this, others before me have already explained it much better. A person lives for four years in a war, or six months in an arctic winter, or a year in a Buddhist monastery, then he lives for a long time, another whole life, but that period of time remains the longest, the most important for him. Maybe because of the emotional tension, because of the simplicity and vividness of the sensations, maybe it’s called something else. Maybe our life is measured not by time, but by the movement of the heart.

He will always remember, will compare his present with that time, which will never turn into the past for him. And the comrades who were next to him then will remain the closest, the most faithful.

And not because good people will never meet again. It's just that those others... they won't understand much, no matter how you explain it. And with your own people, you can even just be silent with them.

Like with Vakha. Sometimes Rodin and Vakha drank together, sometimes they argued and even quarreled, sometimes they simply remained silent. Life was different, yes...

Rodin got married and lived in marriage for twelve years. His wife got a divorce and went to Sverdlovsk to live with her parents. Rodin had no children. But Vakha probably had many children. He himself didn’t know how much. But Vakha did not marry. Vakha was still a reveler.

Neither one nor the other had a big career. But in Soviet times, respected people retired to a decent pension. They stayed in Tallinn. Where were they supposed to go?

Then everything began to change.

Rodin didn't want to think about it.

Everything just changed. And he found himself in a foreign country, where they were forbidden to wear Soviet orders and medals, where they, who had soaked the land from Brest to Moscow and back to Berlin with their blood, were called occupiers.

They were not occupiers. Better than many others, Rodin knew about everything wrong that was happening in that country that had sunk into oblivion. But then, those four years... no, they were not occupiers. Rodin did not understand this anger of prosperous Estonians, who even under Soviet rule lived better than Russian people somewhere in the Urals.

After all, even Vakha, Rodin was ready that after the eviction, after that monstrous injustice, the tragedy of his people, Vakha would begin to hate the Soviet Union and especially the Russians. But it turned out that this was not the case. Vakha has seen too much. In the penal battalion there are Russian officers who heroically escaped captivity and were demoted to rank and file for this, in overcrowded zones and prisons. One day Rodin asked directly whether Vakha blamed the Russians for what happened.

Vakha said that the Russians suffered more than other nations from all this. And Stalin was generally Georgian, although this is not important.

And Vakha also said that together, together, we not only sat in prison zones. Together we defeated the fascists, sent man into space, built socialism in a poor and ruined country. Everyone did this together and all of this - and not just the camps - was called: the Soviet Union.

And today they put on front-line orders and medals. Today was their day. They even went into a bar and took one hundred grams of front-line soldiers, yes. And there, in the bar, young men in fashionable military uniform with stripes stylized as “SS” symbols called them Russian pigs, old drunkards and tore off their awards. They also called Wakha a Russian pig. The knife was just lying on the counter, probably the bartender was using it to chop ice.

Vakha hit the young Estonian between the ribs with a precise blow.

There was also a telephone on the counter, and Rodin threw its cord like a noose around the neck of another SS man. There is no longer that strength in the hands, but it is not needed, every movement of the old scout is worked out to the point of automatism. The frail boy wheezed and fell to the floor.

They returned to that present time. They were Soviet intelligence officers again, and there were enemies around. And everything was correct and simple.

For another five minutes they were young.

While they were being kicked to death on the wooden floor.

And I don't feel sorry for them at all. I simply do not dare to humiliate them with my pity.


V Krupin AND YOU SMILE!

On Sunday, some very important issue was supposed to be decided at a meeting of our housing cooperative. They even collected signatures so that there would be a turnout. But I couldn’t go - I couldn’t take the children anywhere, and my wife was on a business trip.

I went for a walk with them. Even though it was winter, it was melting, and we began to sculpt a snow woman, but what came out was not a woman, but a snowman with a beard, that is, dad. The children demanded to sculpt their mother, then themselves, then their relatives went further afield.

Next to us there was a wire mesh fence for hockey, but there was no ice in it, and the teenagers were playing football. And they drove very excitedly. So we were constantly distracted from our sculptures. Teenagers had a saying: “And you smile!” She stuck to them all. Either they took it from a movie, or they came up with it themselves. The first time it flashed was when one of the teenagers was hit in the face with a wet ball. "It hurts!" - he shouted. "And you smile!" - they answered him amid friendly laughter. The teenager flared up, but pulled back - it was a game of who to be offended by, but I noticed that he began to play angrier and more secretly. He lay in wait for the ball and hit, sometimes not passing to his own, but slamming into his opponents.

Their game was brutal: the boys had watched enough TV. When someone was shunned, pressed against the wire, or pushed away, they shouted triumphantly: “Force move!”

My children stopped sculpting and watched. The guys have a new side hobby - throwing snowballs. Moreover, they did not immediately start aiming at each other, first they aimed at the ball, then at the leg at the moment of impact, and soon there was, as they shouted, “a power struggle all over the field.” It seemed to me that they were fighting - the collisions were so rough and ferocious, blows, snowballs were thrown with all their might at any place on the body. Moreover, the teenagers were happy when they saw that their opponent was hit, and it was hurt. "And you smile!" - they shouted to him. And he smiled and responded in kind. It was not a fight, because it was covered up by a game, sports terms, and a score. But what was it?

Then people came from the meeting of the housing cooperative. The teenagers were taken to dinner by their parents. The chairman of the housing cooperative stopped and scolded me for being absent from the meeting.

You can't stand by. We discussed the issue of teenagers. You see, there are so many cases of teenage cruelty. We need to distract, we need to develop sports. We decided to make another hockey field.

"And you smile!" - suddenly I heard the cry of my children. They shot dad, mom, themselves, and all their relatives with snowballs made of snow.


Ray Bradbury "A Sound of Thunder"

BOOKSHELF FOR TAKEERS OF THE USE IN THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE

Dear applicants!

Having analyzed your questions and essays, I conclude that the most difficult thing for you is the selection of arguments from literary works. The reason is that you don't read much. I won’t say unnecessary words for edification, but will recommend SMALL works that you can read in a few minutes or an hour. I am sure that in these stories and stories you will discover not only new arguments, but also new literature.

Tell us what you think about our bookshelf >>

Karpov Evgeniy “My name is Ivan”

At the very end of the war, the Germans set fire to the tank in which Semyon Avdeev was a turret shooter.
For two days, blind, burned, with a broken leg, Semyon crawled among some ruins. It seemed to him that the blast wave had thrown him out of the tank into a deep hole.
For two days, one step at a time, half a step, a centimeter per hour, he climbed out of this smoky pit towards the sun, into the fresh wind, dragging his broken leg, often losing consciousness. On the third day, sappers found him, barely alive, in the ruins of an ancient castle. And for a long time, the surprised sappers wondered how a wounded tanker could get to this ruin that no one wanted...
In the hospital, Semyon’s leg was amputated up to the knee and then they took him to famous professors for a long time so that they could restore his sight.
But nothing came of it...
While Semyon was surrounded by comrades, cripples just like him, while a smart, kind doctor was next to him, while nurses cared for him, he somehow forgot about his injury, he lived like everyone else lives. Behind the laughter, behind the joke, I forgot my grief.
But when Semyon left the hospital onto the city street - not for a walk, but completely, into life, he suddenly felt the whole world was completely different from the one that surrounded him yesterday, the day before yesterday and his entire past life.
Although Semyon was told a few weeks ago that his vision would not return, he still harbored hope in his heart. And now everything has collapsed. It seemed to Semyon that he again found himself in that black pit where the blast wave had thrown him. Only then did he passionately want to get out into the fresh wind, towards the sun, he believed that he would get out, but now he did not have that confidence. Anxiety crept into my heart. The city was incredibly noisy, and the sounds were somehow elastic, and it seemed to him that if he took even one step forward, these elastic sounds would throw him back, hurt him painfully against the stones.
Behind the hospital. Along with everyone else, Semyon scolded him for his boredom, wondered how to get out of it, and now he suddenly became so dear, so necessary. But you can’t go back there, even though it’s still very close. We have to go forward, but it’s scary. Afraid of the seething cramped city, but most of all afraid of himself:
Leshka Kupriyanov brought Semyon out of his stupor.
- Oh, and the weather! Now I just want to go for a walk with the girl! Yes, in the field, yes, collect flowers, and run.
I like to fool around. Let's go! What are you up to?
They went.
Semyon heard how the prosthesis creaked and slammed, how heavily Leshka breathed with a whistle. These were the only familiar, close sounds, and the clanging of trams, the screams of cars, the laughter of children seemed alien, cold. They parted in front of him and ran around. The stones of the pavement and some pillars got tangled under our feet and prevented us from walking.
Semyon knew Leshka for about a year. Small in stature, it often served him as a crutch. It used to be that Semyon would lie on the bed and shout: “Nanny, give me a crutch,” and Leshka would run up and squeak, fooling around:
- I'm here, Count. Give me your whitest pen. Place it, Most Serene One, on my unworthy shoulder.
So they walked around hugging each other. Semyon knew Leshka's round, armless shoulder and faceted, shorn head well by touch. And now he put his hand on Leshka’s shoulder and his soul immediately felt calmer.
They spent the whole night, first in the dining room, and then in the restaurant at the station. When they went to the dining room, Leshka said that they would drink a hundred grams, have a good dinner and leave on the night train. We drank as agreed. Leshka suggested repeating it. Semyon did not refuse, although he rarely drank at all. Vodka flowed surprisingly easily today. The hops were pleasant, did not stupefy the head, but awakened good thoughts in it. True, it was impossible to concentrate on them. They were nimble and slippery, like fish, and, like fish, they slipped out and disappeared into the dark distance. This made my heart feel sad, but the sadness did not linger long. It was replaced by memories or naive but pleasant fantasies. It seemed to Semyon that one morning he would wake up and see the sun, grass, and a ladybug. And then suddenly a girl appeared. He clearly saw the color of her eyes, hair, and felt her tender cheeks. This girl fell in love with him, with the blind man. They talked a lot about these people in the ward and even read a book out loud.
Leshka was missing his right arm and three ribs. The war, as he said with a laugh, cut him to pieces. In addition, he was wounded in the neck. After the throat operation, he spoke intermittently, with a hiss, but Semyon got used to these sounds, which bear little resemblance to human sounds. They irritated him less than the accordion players playing a waltz, than the flirtatious cooing of the woman at the next table.
From the very beginning, as soon as wine and appetizers began to be served on the table, Leshka chatted merrily and laughed contentedly:
- Eh, Senka, I love nothing in the world more than a well-cleaned table! I love to have fun - especially to eat! Before the war, we used to go to Bear Lakes with the whole plant in the summer. Brass band and buffets! And I am with an accordion. There is company under every bush, and in every company I, like Sadko, am a welcome guest. “Stretch it, Alexey Svet-Nikolaevich.” Why not stretch it out if they ask and the wine is already poured. And some blue-eyed woman brings ham on a fork...
They drank, ate, and sipped, savoring, cold, thick beer. Leshka continued to talk enthusiastically about his Moscow region. His sister lives there in her own house. She works as a technician at a chemical plant. The sister, as Leshka assured, would definitely fall in love with Semyon. They will get married. Then they will have children. The children will have as many toys as they want and whatever they want. Semyon will make them himself in the artel where they will work.
Soon it became difficult for Leshka to speak: he was tired, and it seemed that he stopped believing in what he was talking about. They were silent more, they drank more...
Semyon remembers how Leshka wheezed: “We are lost people, it would be better if they killed us completely.” He remembers how heavy his head became, how dark it became - the bright visions disappeared. The cheerful voices and music completely drove him crazy. I wanted to beat everyone, to smash them, Leshka hissed:
- Don't go home. Who needs you like that?
Home? Where is the house? A long, long time ago, maybe
a hundred years ago he had a house. And there was a garden, and a birdhouse on a birch tree, and rabbits. Small, with red eyes, they trustingly jumped towards him, sniffed his boots, and moved their pink nostrils funny. Mother... Semyon was called an “anarchist” because, although he studied well at school, he was desperately hooligan, smoked, and because he and his gang staged merciless raids on gardens and orchards. And she, the mother, never scolded him. The father spanked mercilessly, and the mother only timidly asked not to be a bully. She herself gave money for cigarettes and did her best to hide Semenov’s tricks from her father. Semyon loved his mother and helped her in everything: chopping wood, carrying water, cleaning the cowshed. The neighbors were jealous of Anna Filippovna, seeing how deftly her son managed the housework,
“There will be a breadwinner,” they said, “and the seventeenth water will wash away the boyish nonsense.”
Drunk Semyon remembered this word - “breadwinner” - and repeated it to himself, gritting his teeth so as not to cry. What kind of breadwinner is he now? A collar around the mother's neck.
The comrades saw how Semyon’s tank was burning, but no one saw how Semyon got out of it. The mother was sent a notice that her son had died. And now Semyon was wondering whether it was worth reminding her of her worthless life? Is it worth stirring up her tired, broken heart with new pain?
A drunken woman was laughing nearby. Leshka kissed her with wet lips and hissed something incomprehensible. The dishes rattled, the table overturned, and the earth turned over.
We woke up in a woodshed at a restaurant. Someone caring spread straw for them and gave them two old blankets. All the money has been spent on drink, the requirements for tickets have been lost, and it’s a six-day drive to Moscow. To go to the hospital and say that they had been robbed was not enough of a conscience.
Leshka offered to travel without tickets, in the position of beggars. Semyon was even scared to think about it. He suffered for a long time, but there was nothing to do. We need to go, we need to eat. Semyon agreed to walk along the carriages, but he would not say anything, he would pretend to be dumb.

We entered the carriage. Leshka began his speech smartly in his hoarse voice:
- Brothers and sisters, help the unfortunate cripples...
Semyon walked bent over, as if through a cramped black dungeon. It seemed to him that sharp stones were hanging over his head. The hum of voices could be heard from afar, but as soon as he and Leshka approached, this hum disappeared, and Semyon heard only Leshka and the jingling of coins in the pi-tray. This tinkling made Semyon shiver. He lowered his head lower, hiding his eyes, forgetting that they were blind and could not see reproach, anger, or regret.
The further they walked, the more unbearable Leshka’s crying voice became for Semyon. It was stuffy in the carriages. It was completely impossible to breathe, when suddenly, from the open window, a fragrant, meadow wind blew into his face, and Semyon was frightened by it, recoiled, and hurt his head painfully on the shelf.
We walked the entire train, collected more than two hundred rubles and got off at the station for lunch. Leshka was pleased with his first success and spoke boastfully about his lucky “planid”. Semyon wanted to cut Leshka off, to hit him, but even more he wanted to get drunk quickly and get rid of himself.
We drank three-star cognac, snacked on crabs and cakes, since there was nothing else in the buffet.
Having gotten drunk, Leshka found friends in the neighborhood, danced with them to the accordion, and bawled songs. Semyon first cried, then somehow he forgot, began to stomp his feet, and then sing along, clap his hands, and finally sang:
But we don’t sow, and we don’t plow, But an ace, an eight, and a jack, And from prison we wave a handkerchief, Four on the side - and yours are gone...,
...They were again left without a penny of money at someone else's distant station.
It took the friends a whole month to get to Moscow. Leshka became so comfortable with begging that sometimes he even acted up, singing vulgar jokes. Semyon no longer felt remorse. He reasoned simply: we need money to get to Moscow - can’t steal? And when they get drunk, it’s temporary. He will come to Moscow, get a job in an artel and take his mother with him, he will definitely take her and maybe even get married. Well, if other cripples have the good fortune, it will happen to him too...
Semyon sang front-line songs. He behaved confidently, proudly raising his head with dead eyes, shaking his long, thick hair to the beat of the song. And it turned out that he was not asking for alms, but was condescendingly taking the reward due to him. His voice was good, his songs were soulful, and the passengers generously gave to the blind singer.
The passengers especially liked the song, which told about how a soldier was quietly dying in a green meadow, an old birch tree bent over him. She extended her branch-like arms to the soldier, like a mother. The fighter tells the birch tree that his mother and girlfriend are waiting for him in a distant village, but he will not come to them, because he is “betrothed to the white birch tree forever,” and that she is now his “bride and his own mother.” In conclusion, the soldier asks: “Sing, my birch tree, sing, my bride, about the living, about the kind, about people in love - I will sleep sweetly to this song.”
It happened that in another carriage Semyon was asked to sing this song several times. Then they took with them in their caps not only silver, but also a bunch of paper money.
Upon arrival in Moscow, Leshka flatly refused to join the artel. Wandering on electric trains, as he said, is not a dusty job and it doesn’t cost money. My only concern is to evade the policeman. True, this was not always successful. Then he was sent to a nursing home, but he safely escaped from there the next day.
Semyon also visited the home for the disabled. Well, he said, it’s nourishing and cozy, there’s good supervision, the artists come, but it all seems like you’re sitting buried in a mass grave. I was also in the artel. “They took it like something they don’t know where to put, and put it next to the machine.” The whole day he sat and splashed - he stamped some tins. From right and left the press clapped, dryly, annoyingly. An iron box rattled across the concrete floor, in which blanks were dragged in and finished parts were pulled away. The old man who was carrying this box approached Semyon several times and whispered, breathing in the fumes of tobacco:
- You’re here for a day, sit for another, and then ask for another job. At least for a break. You'll make money there. And here the work is hard,” and the earnings are barely... Don’t be silent, but step on the throat, otherwise... It would be best to take a liter and drink it with the foreman. He would then give you money for the work. Our foreman is a good guy .
Semyon listened to the angry talk of the workshop, the teachings of the old man and thought that he was not needed here at all, and everything here was alien to him. He felt his restlessness especially clearly during lunch.
The cars fell silent. People could be heard talking and laughing. They sat on workbenches, on boxes, untying their bundles, rattling pots, rustling paper. It smelled like homemade pickles and garlic cutlets. Early in the morning these bundles were collected by the hands of mothers or wives. The working day will end, and all these people will go home. There they are waiting, there they are dear. And he? Who cares about him? No one will even take you to the dining room if you sit without lunch. And so Semyon wanted the warmth of home, someone’s affection... Should he go to his mother? “No, it’s too late now. Let it all go to waste."
“Comrade,” someone touched Semyon on the shoulder. “Why did you hug the stamp?” Come and eat with us.
Semyon shook his head negatively.
- Well, as you wish, otherwise let's go. Don't blame me.
It always happens again, and then you get used to it.
Semyon would have gone home at that very moment, but he didn’t know the way. Leshka brought him to work and in the evening he was supposed to come pick him up. But he didn't come. Semyon waited for him for a whole hour. The shift watchman escorted him home.
My arms hurt because I was not used to it, my back was breaking. Without washing or having dinner, Semyon went to bed and fell into a heavy, troubled sleep. Leshka woke up. He came drunk, with a drunk company, with bottles of vodka. Semyon began to drink greedily...
The next day I didn’t go to work. We walked around the carriages again.
A long time ago, Semyon stopped thinking about his life, stopped being upset about his blindness, and lived as God dictated. He sang badly: his voice was strained. Instead of songs, it turned out to be a continuous scream. He did not have the same confidence in his gait, pride in the manner of holding his head, all that remained was arrogance. But generous Muscovites still donated, so there was a lot of money from friends.
After several scandals, Leshka’s sister left for an apartment. A beautiful house with carved windows turned into a hangout.
Anna Filippovna has aged a lot in recent years. During the war, my husband died somewhere while digging trenches. The news of her son’s death completely knocked her down; she thought she wouldn’t get up, but somehow everything worked out. After the war, her niece Shura came to her (she had just graduated from college at that time and got married), came and said: “Why, auntie, are you going to live here as an orphan, sell your hut and let’s come to me.” The neighbors condemned Anna Filippovna, saying that the most important thing for a person is to have his own corner. No matter what happens, keep your house and live neither damned nor crumpled. Otherwise, you sell the house, the money will fly by, and then who knows how it will turn out.
It may be that what people said was true, but the niece got used to Anna Filippovna from an early age, treated her like her own mother, and sometimes lived with her for several years, because they did not get along with their stepmother. In a word, Anna Filippovna made up her mind. She sold the house and went to Shura, lived for four years and didn’t complain. And she really liked Moscow.
Today she went to see the dacha that the young couple had rented for the summer. She liked the dacha: a garden, a small vegetable garden.
Thinking that today she needed to mend the boys’ old shirts and pants for the village, she heard a song. In some ways it was familiar to her, but in what ways she couldn’t understand. Then I realized - a voice! She understood and shuddered and turned pale.
For a long time I did not dare to look in that direction, I was afraid that the painfully familiar voice would disappear. And yet I looked. I looked... Senka!
The mother, as if blind, stretched out her hands and walked towards her son. Now she is already next to him, putting her hands on his shoulders. And Senkina’s shoulders, with sharp little bumps. I wanted to call my son by name but couldn’t - there was no air in my chest and I didn’t have enough strength to breathe.
The blind man fell silent. He felt the woman’s hands and became wary.
The passengers saw how the beggar turned pale, how he wanted to say something and could not - he suffocated. Seen

passengers, like a blind man, put his hand on the woman’s hair and immediately pulled it back.
“Senya,” the woman said quietly and weakly.
The passengers stood up and waited with trepidation for his answer.
At first the blind man only moved his lips, and then said dully:
- Citizen, you are mistaken. My name is Ivan.
“What!” exclaimed the mother. “Senya, what are you doing?!” The blind man pushed her aside and with a quick, uneven gait
he moved on and didn’t sing anymore.
Passengers saw a woman looking after the beggar and whispering: “He, he.” There were no tears in her eyes, only prayer and suffering. Then they disappeared, leaving anger. The terrible anger of an insulted mother...
She lay in a severe faint on the sofa. An elderly man, probably a doctor, leaned over her. The passengers asked each other in a whisper to disperse, to give access to fresh air, but did not disperse.
“Maybe I was mistaken?” someone asked hesitantly.
“Mother will not be mistaken,” answered the gray-haired woman,
- So why didn’t he confess?
- How can you confess to someone like that?
- Silly...
A few minutes later Semyon came in and asked:
- Where is my mother?
“You no longer have a mother,” the doctor answered.
The wheels were knocking. For a minute Semyon seemed to see the light, saw the people, was afraid of them and began to back away. The cap fell out of his hands; the little things crumbled and rolled across the floor, clinking coldly and uselessly...