A special place in the work of Chekhov the humorist is occupied by a miniature joke story and an everyday scene, entirely built on dialogue. They are still popular today because behind the comical dialogues, the life and customs of an entire era are revealed. A number of humoresques are based on the principle of mutual misunderstanding of the participants in the conversation, each of whom repeats his own. This is exactly the case in the story “The Intruder.”
On August 7, 1885, “The Intruder” was published in the “Petersburgskaya Gazeta” under the pseudonym “Antosha Chekhonte”, which was subsequently included in the writer’s first collection “Motley Stories”.
Vladimir Gilyarovsky believed that the prototype of the main character is the peasant Nikita Pantyukhin from the village of Kraskovo, Moscow province. Although the writer had a negative attitude towards the question of the prototypes of his heroes, since for the most part his characters are generalized images.
Genre, direction
The life of ordinary people in Russia, their feelings and aspirations have always interested Anton Pavlovich. He is a successor to the best traditions of the realistic movement in literature. The style of his prose is satirical, where there are “funny” situations and scenes, absurd forms of behavior and speech.
The work was published with the subtitle “Scene”. The genre is a humorous story in which the author delicately, with irony and compassion laughs at his characters.
Humor is associated with a vivid vocabulary surprise, illiterate, illogical speech of the character, as well as an absurd situation when the investigator believes that there is an attacker in front of him demanding punishment, and the “person under investigation” does not understand the tragedy of his own situation.
“Funny” and “sad” are closely intertwined in the story.
Plot
The focus is on the dialogue between the forensic investigator and the stupid “little man”, this is the essence of the story.
A skinny man unscrews a nut on a railroad track in the morning. The lineman Ivan Akinfov catches him doing this “work” and takes him to the forensic investigator. An interrogation begins in order to clarify the circumstances of the theft and prove Grigoriev’s guilt.
The man admits that what happened (the theft of the nut) is a common thing for the Klimovsk men, since their main business is fishing. And nuts are used to make sinkers.
To the accusation that unscrewing the nuts could lead to a train crash, Denis, grinning, objects: “If only the rail had been carried away... otherwise... the nut!”
The result of the investigative dialogue is that the “attacker” is taken into custody and sent to prison.
The main characters and their characteristics
- Denis Grigoriev. Characteristics and description of the attacker: a skinny little man with overgrown hair. Thick eyebrows hang over the eyes, giving the impression of constant gloominess. The head of unkempt hair somewhat resembles a spider's web. Denis’s appearance most likely speaks of his untidiness rather than poverty. Grigoriev’s portrait is evidence of the character’s “confused” life, which he himself cannot understand. He is well versed in the fishery business. Knows the peculiarities of fishing for different types of fish. He is a practical person, as he sensibly explains why lead, a bullet or nails should not be used as a sinker. He indignantly rejects the accusation that unscrewing the nuts could lead to the death of people (“we are some kind of villains”). Honesty is an important trait of his character. When the investigator directly tells him that Denis is lying, he is sincerely surprised by this, since “I never lied.” He talks in detail about the existence of nuts among him and other men. In particular, Mitrofan Petrov needs a lot of nuts, from which he makes seines, and then sells them to the gentlemen.
- Investigator- representative of the law. The author does not endow him with any portrait characteristics or character traits characteristic of him. The absence of a name suggests that this is a collective image of the social layer of bureaucracy.
- The problem of the people is decided by the writer in his own way. He lives in transitional Russia, among humiliated people and deprived of fate. He does not stay away from the “peasant” theme. Truthfully shows the contradictions of village life. Having no other income, village men fish to feed themselves. And for this you need nuts that can only be unscrewed from the railway tracks. And the person finds himself at a crossroads: a state of servitude forces him to commit a “crime” (although he himself does not think so), which is then inevitably followed by “punishment”.
- In this regard, there arises problem of justice, responsibility before the law. An evildoer is a person who deliberately intended evil and is therefore obliged to appear before the law. But men who find themselves in difficult social conditions are not like that. They are Christians. “Evil” and “crime” are alien concepts to them.
- The problem of power, violence a red thread runs through the entire narrative. For what everyone else does, one will receive hard labor, and only because a lazy official accidentally noticed him. Alas, there is no supervision of the tracks, so people don’t even know what can be done and what cannot be done. To them, illiterate and uneducated, no one explained the meaning of the laws.
- The problem of mutual misunderstanding. Thus, the investigator, recalling the train crash last year, speaks of his “understanding” of what happened, linking the tragedy with the theft of nuts. Denis perceives this situation in his own way, interpreting the investigator’s “understanding” as a feature characteristic only of educated people. In his opinion, the “peasant mind” perceives what is happening differently and is not capable of drawing conclusions. Grigoriev is told that he could be sentenced “to exile at hard labor,” to which Denis replies: “You know better... We are dark people...”. When they announce that the consequence of his “actions” is now being sent to prison, he objects with surprise that there is no time now, since he needs to go to the fair.
- Theme of negligence, dishonest attitude towards state property is not affected by chance. Rich gentlemen buy seines to satisfy their personal needs, and do not think at all about where men get their nuts from. The gentlemen who buy gear are absolutely not concerned about the condition of the railway, about train crashes, or about the fact that they themselves may find themselves in one of them. This is some kind of typically Russian irresponsibility that has been accumulating in the Russian people for centuries.
Topics and issues
The problems of the story are rich and complex, which makes it all the more surprising that the author put it into such a laconic form.
the main idea
Sparing details recreate a picture of village everyday life, behind which the features of Russian reality are revealed. And in this mosaic, consisting of many “episodes,” hidden evil triumphs, and the point of the story is to show and prove it. All content is imbued with deep drama. The reader is presented with a painfully unhappy man, driven by circumstances. He is a savage, but pity for him, for ordinary men, for the fact that a person essentially innocent of the evil that is happening may suffer, “overwhelms” the reader.
The accusatory scene presents a line of protest against the lies that reign in Russia, where unenlightened people eke out a miserable existence, and the government, which does not see the person, hides behind laws that contradict the humane attitude towards people. This is the main idea of the work. The story evokes feelings of bitterness and regret.
What does it teach?
Chekhov cultivates independence, will and intelligence in his reader. What worries him most is the inner weakness of the human spirit. He says: “It is better to die from fools than to receive praise from them.” The main criterion of actions should be conscience. Everything must be done according to conscience: “Even if you flog, but for the sake of it.” Here is the moral of the piece.
The writer wanted cheerfulness to become everyone’s lifestyle, because it is precisely this that is a condition and a sure sign of the spiritual health of the nation.
The true criminals are those “masters of life” who do not care about public order, but satisfy only their whims and desires.
What is the author making fun of?
Chekhov was convinced that slavish behavior before the “powers that be” could only be countered by laughter. The writer makes fun of the darkness and ignorance of the people, who are not free even in their own feelings.
The comedy is created by the equanimity and peculiar prudence of the responses of the “attacker”, who is unable to understand what they want from him and why he is here. The position of the investigator, driven to frenzy by the impenetrable stupidity of the man, is comical.
Chekhov's humor always “keeps pace” with sadness, which is born from the fact that a person cannot stand up for himself or maintain his self-esteem.
Laughter is a reason to pay attention, first of all, to your shortcomings and “squeeze the slave out of yourself drop by drop.”
Interesting? Save it on your wall!Problems and artistic features of the story “The Intruder”.
The title of the humorous story “Intruder” immediately raises doubts that we are talking about a real attacker. So it turns out. There is not a shadow of malicious intent in the actions of the peasant Denis Grigoriev; in fact, the comedy of the situation is manifested in the collision of two worlds: a civilization that has cut up the natural world with railroads, and a peasantry living an eternal natural life. This is where misunderstanding arises, since the investigator, accusing the peasant of criminal acts, does not doubt the obviousness of the offense and his guilt. The peasant, diligently listening to the investigator, does not understand how he cannot understand that fishing requires weights for the tackle.
It may seem that the misunderstanding is due to the stupidity and ignorance of the peasant. This is not true at all. Of course, the peasant Denis Grigoriev is an uneducated person, but in those moments when something similar to a dialogue arises between him and the investigator, he casually, as a matter of course, explains to the “stupid” investigator: “We understand this... We don’t unscrew everything... we leave... We don’t do it crazy... we understand...
Let us note that both - the investigator and the peasant - are trying to overcome the misunderstanding between themselves: the investigator is trying to explain "on fingers" that the trains are going off the rails and to provoke a reasoning or at least a reaction from the peasant about this, the peasant, in turn, tells in detail , what kind of fish is found in the depths, and only the shilishper can be hoped for, but it is not found in their waters.
The author gives the peasant the appearance of some kind of woodsman, overgrown and stern, in order to emphasize the impenetrability of his world. The forensic investigator is completely devoid of portrait characteristics; it, apparently, is not needed, because he belongs to the world of modern civilization, which erases individual features. At the beginning of the story, the man asks the investigator twice when he starts talking about nuts, as if leading the man to a confession, uttering the seemingly meaningless “FAQ?” At first, we decide that the peasant is simply impossibly stupid, then, after looking closely and thinking, we understand what the purpose of these repeated questions is: Chekhov, an unsurpassed master in depicting the psychology of personal and social communication, shows that the peasant seems to “meet halfway” to the investigator, helping him find clear words to establish contact.
Further, with the establishment of contact, the stimulating word “FAQ” is no longer required, but misunderstanding grows and the scene ends with the arrest of the “criminal,” as the man says, “not according to conscience,” since he believes that he was arrested for non-payment of arrears, which was not his responsibility . So, if we think from the position of an investigator and our common sense as a modern person, then the man Denis Grigoriev is hopelessly stupid, absolutely undeveloped, completely mired in an archaic world.
If you look at what is happening with his peasant eyes, then he should evaluate it in the following order: incomprehensible accusation, misunderstanding, obfuscation, unjust arrest. The nature of the comic in A.P. Chekhov’s story “The Intruder.” Modern philologist-researcher AD. Stepanov reveals the nature of the comic in “The Intruder” by analyzing the features of communication between the characters reflected in the story.
The story recreates the “dialogue of the deaf”: we have, in essence, two parallel series of statements with logical breaks between them, unable to enter into dialogue. On the one hand, these are legal genres - interrogation, accusation, incrimination, etc., up to a quote from the “Code of Punishments”, and on the other hand, there are instructions on fishing for beginners. Genres do not follow from each other, but are only juxtaposed; the only thing they have in common is a refrain - an event that occurred to which speakers attribute opposite meanings.
In the case when the hero is firmly identified with only one role, Chekhov's texts speak of the incompatibility of the role-for-himself and the role-for-another. The comic effect here is generated by the fact that the hero does not understand his role in the eyes of his interlocutor and the reader: the “attacker” Denis Grigoriev does not understand his role as a defendant. The role-for-another in Chekhov's humoresques is often something imposed from the outside, unnecessary and/or incomprehensible for the hero himself.
Chekhov's stories as assessed by critics and literary scholars. “Two main vices of the philistine soul seemed especially vile to Chekhov: abuse of the weak and self-abasement before the strong” (Chukovsky). “Small strokes, sometimes in one word, paint both life and the situation so clearly that you are only amazed at this ability - to bring into one tiny focus all the necessary details, only the most necessary, and at the same time excite your feelings and awaken thought: in fact, take a deeper look at this investigator and this man, because these are two worlds, separated from the same life; both are Russian, both are not essentially evil people, and both do not understand each other.
Just think about this, and you will understand the depth of content in this tiny story, presented on two and a half pages” (L. E. Obolensky). “Another time I found a young, handsome fellow prosecutor with him. He stood in front of Chekhov and, shaking his curly head, said smartly: With the story “The Intruder,” you, Anton Pavlovich, pose an extremely difficult question to me. If I recognize in Denis Grigoriev the presence of evil will, which acted consciously, I must, without reservation, put Denis in prison, as the interests of society require. But he is a savage, he did not realize the crime of his act, I feel sorry for him! If I treat him as a subject who acted without understanding, and succumb to a feeling of compassion, how can I guarantee society that Denis will not again unscrew the nuts on the rails and cause a crash? Here's the question! How to be?
He fell silent, threw his body back and stared into Anton Pavlovich’s face with a searching gaze. His uniform was brand new, and the buttons on his chest glittered as self-confidently and stupidly as the little eyes on the clean face of the young zealot for justice. If I were a judge,” Anton Pavlovich said seriously, “I would acquit Denis... On what grounds?” I would tell him: “You, Denis, have not yet matured into the type of conscious criminal, go and mature!” The lawyer laughed, but immediately became solemnly serious again and continued: No, dear Anton Pavlovich, the question you posed can only be resolved in the interests of society, whose life and property I am called upon to protect. Denis is a savage, yes, but he is a criminal, that’s the truth!
Do you like the gramophone? - Anton Pavlovich suddenly asked affectionately. Oh yeah! Very! Amazing invention! - the young man responded vividly. “But I can’t stand gramophones!” Anton Pavlovich confessed sadly. Why? Yes, they talk and sing without feeling anything. And everything about them turns out to be a caricature, dead... After seeing the young man off, Anton Pavlovich said gloomily: These are the pimples on... the seat of justice - they control the fate of people” (M Gorky). “Laughing at the order, which with blunt mechanical force separates people into categories, placing some in semi-slavish dependence on others... Chekhov sadly reminds us of forgotten human dignity” (Z. I. Paperny). “Tolstoy, praising his stories, said that every detail in him is “either necessary or beautiful,” but in Chekhov himself the necessary and the beautiful are not separated, there is identity between them” (Ya Weil, L. Genis).
5 / 5. 1
A.P. Chekhov's story “The Intruder” was first published in July 1885 in the Petersburg Newspaper. He continues the line of Chekhov’s miniatures, which make readers “laugh through tears.” Analysis of this work reveals the abyss of peasant-lord relations in Russia at that point in time.
Storyline of the story
In the story, a man named Denis Grigoriev appears before the court - barefoot, not distinguished by his mental alertness, but ready to defend his innocence to the end.
His crime was that he unscrewed the nuts on the railroad tracks. During the interrogation, it turns out that the nuts are needed for the seine, which does not want to sink without them. The judge tries to explain to Denis that this could cause the train to derail and kill people. But Denis claims that this was not even in his thoughts, but the seine is unsuitable for fishing without nuts.
Moreover, it turns out that almost all the men in the village are engaged in this activity and even sell these seines to the gentlemen.
The judge has no choice but to give the order to take Denis back to prison, to which the man is naively and sincerely surprised: for what?
The miniature story raises the topic of negligence, which has always existed in Russia. Who is to blame for the fact that men pull nuts out of the railroad, resulting in train accidents and people dying? While reading the work, one does not get the impression at all that Denis had such intent and that he is a malicious violator of the law. He appears before the court barefoot, which means he is poor, and the net is his way of survival. Can you really blame him for getting his own food? After all, he has no intention of killing innocent people.
The story very clearly articulates the problem of who is the real culprit of this negligence and the real attacker. The gentlemen to whom the village men sell these tackles know very well where the nuts on the seines come from. And they are certainly much smarter than men and understand perfectly well what such “handicraft” of men can lead to. But they are silent. They remain silent and continue to buy seines with nuts from rails.
The story is written in a realistic direction, as it specifically paints pictures of Russian reality at the end of the 19th century. The work is unusual in its composition, since it has neither beginning nor end: a part of Denis’s trial seems to have been torn out of the general course of the investigation. The verdict remains unknown: Chekhov wanted the reader to make it himself.
Very short in content, but capacious in terms of ideas, A.P. Chekhov’s story “The Intruder” makes the reader think about the topic of negligence in Russia and its true culprits.
Be sure to read other essays:
- Analysis of the story by A.P. Chekhov's "Ionych"
- “Tosca”, analysis of Chekhov’s work, essay
- “The Death of an Official,” analysis of Chekhov’s story, essay
The theme of Chekhov's "The Intruder"? and got the best answer
Answer from GALINA[guru]
The story clearly showed all the features of Chekhov’s humor:
laconicism and accuracy in creating images, the ability to use several
to outline in strokes a problem sometimes on an all-Russian scale.
The writer reveals the problem
Russian national character: negligence, hope
on the off chance, the desire to get out in every possible way
ways; explains darkness, ignorance, lack of education
man, the logic of survival in those social conditions
in which a person turns into a wild, absurd, downtrodden creature.
Answer from Kirill Semenov[guru]
The miniature story raises the topic of negligence, which has always existed in Russia. Who is to blame for the fact that men pull nuts out of the railroad, resulting in train accidents and people dying? While reading the work, one does not get the impression at all that Denis had such intent and that he is a malicious violator of the law. He appears before the court barefoot, which means he is poor, and the net is his way of survival. Can you really blame him for getting his own food? After all, he has no intention of killing innocent people.
The story very clearly articulates the problem of who is the real culprit of this negligence and the real attacker. The gentlemen to whom the village men sell these tackles know very well where the nuts on the seines come from. And they are certainly much smarter than men and understand perfectly well what such “handicraft” of men can lead to. But they are silent. They remain silent and continue to buy seines with nuts from rails.
The story is written in a realistic direction, as it specifically paints pictures of Russian reality at the end of the 19th century. The work is unusual in its composition, since it has neither beginning nor end: a part of Denis’s trial seems to have been torn out of the general course of the investigation. The verdict remains unknown: Chekhov wanted the reader to make it himself.
Very short in content, but capacious in terms of ideas, A.P. Chekhov’s story “The Intruder” makes the reader think about the topic of negligence in Russia and its true culprits.
link
Answer from 3 answers[guru]
Hello! Here is a selection of topics with answers to your question: The theme of Chekhov's "The Intruder"?
Essay on literature. Condemnation of everyday vulgarity and servility on the pages of the stories of A.P.
Lesson topic: Analysis of the story by A.P. Chekhov
"Intruder."
Lesson Objectives : Analyze A.P. Chekhov’s story “The Intruder”, teach to read thoughtfully, expressively, and read by role; to intensify independent work of students;
Develop coherent speech, thinking, expand vocabulary, as well as creative abilities of students;
To foster a civic position and a negative attitude towards theft;
Be able to give a portrait description of a literary hero.
Equipment : Portrait of A.P. Chekhov, the story “The Intruder”, an exhibition of books dedicated to the work of A.P. Chekhov, an exhibition of children’s drawings “Visiting Antosha Chekhonte”, on the board - new words, questions, textbook “Literature 7th grade”, Explanatory dictionaries, visual aids: “Pseudonyms of A.P. Chekhov”, “Characteristics of a literary hero”.
DURING THE CLASSES.
1.Students’ mood for the lesson.
2. The teacher's word.
Today in class we will continue to study the work of the wonderful Russian man, doctor, writer - A.P. Chekhov.
We have to analyze the new story by A.C. Chekhov “The Intruder”.
Checking homework.
Tell us about the outstanding Russian writer A.P. Chekhov.
A.P. Chekhov is a Russian writer, honorary academician of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences (1900-1902). Born in Taganrog into a large family... Chekhov’s large family had four brothers and a sister. But the main thing in the family was the father...
Conversation on questions:
What kind of person was A.P. Chekhov's father? (Severe, religious)
Where did A.P. Chekhov study? (At the gymnasium, at the same time he helped his father in trade).
When the family went bankrupt and was forced to leave for Moscow, Anton remained in Taganrog. What did the young man do for a living? (Lessons for rich kids).
What else did Anton do during this period of his life? (Writes his first stories, creates a handwritten journal).
In 1879, after graduating from high school in Taganrog, where did A.P. Chekhov go? (At the Medical Faculty of Moscow University).
Teacher's word.
He carefully attended lectures, listened to professors, passed exams, meanwhile, “While I was studying,” Chekhov recalled, I managed to write hundreds of stories under the pseudonym A. Chekhonte, which, as you can see, is very similar to my last name.”
Guys, remember what a pseudonym is? (This is the signature with which the author replaces his real name).
A.P. Chekhov had many pseudonyms at the beginning of his career. Remember how he also signed his stories (A.Ch., The Man Without a Spleen, My Brother’s Brother).
Now look at how A.P. Chekhov signed his early stories. (The children’s attention is drawn to the visual aid “Pseudonyms of A.P. Chekhov”).
Guys, what should stories signed with such pseudonyms be like? (Funny, cheerful, instructive).
Which stories by Antoshi Chekhonte have you read before? (“Horse Name”, “Fat and Thin”, “Death of an Official”, “Chameleon”, “Melancholy”, “Wool”, “Kashtanka”, etc.)
What stories by A.P. Chekhov did you prepare drawings for? (Board. Exhibition of drawings “Visiting Antoshi Chekhonte.”
Indeed, Antoshi Chekhonte’s first stories are funny, amusing, and witty. And only one word will be the most accurate. What kind of stories are these? (Humorous).
What is humor? (A type of comic; friendly and cheerful laughter. A way of revealing the character of the hero in a funny way).
Teacher's word.
Not everyone has a developed sense of humor. It is important to notice what is funny; an even more difficult task is to convey your mood to your listeners and make them laugh. Chekhov does not compose funny stories, he draws episodes of life that any person can experience. But what makes these stories comical is something we have to find out.
3.Explanation of new material.
A.P. Chekhov's story “The Intruder” is both funny and sad.
Our task is to understand why?
What does the writer laugh sadly about? What upsets him?
(Write down the topic of today's lesson in your workbooks)
Vocabulary work.
Guys, at home you read the story “Intruder”. Name words from the text whose lexical meaning you do not understand.
A motley shirt is a shirt made from motley, coarse linen or cotton fabric made from multi-colored threads, usually homespun);
Known - of course, naturally;
Live bait is a small fish used to catch larger fish;
Crawler - the outer cover of an insect, caterpillar, also used for fishing;
Do - do, commit;
Arrears - unpaid debt, unpaid debt;
Intent is a premeditated intention;
- “faq” – common folk – what;
Versta – 1.06 km. old Russian measure of length.
Board.
Pay attention to the following forms of expressions and turns of phrase and find modern equivalents for them:
The seventh of this year (the seventh of this year)
Ivan Semenov Akinfov (Ivan Semenovich Akinfov)
Penal Code (Punishment Law)
Teacher's word.
What did you laugh about in the story?
What's funny and what's sad in the story?
The funny thing is that the characters talk about different things and can’t understand each other.
The feeling of sadness is caused by the dense lack of education of Denis Grigoriev, his lack of understanding of obvious things, as well as the fact of punishing a person who does not understand why he is being punished.
What feeling did you have after reading the story?
Remember the content of the work. (Plot summary)
Is Denis to blame for his crime?
Give a description of Denis according to plan. (Board.)
Characteristics of a literary hero.
a) The place occupied by the hero in the work.
b) The hero’s position in society.
c) Portrait characteristics.
d) Speech characteristics.
When characterizing Denis Grigoriev, let us pay attention to his portrait, which testifies not so much to poverty as to the untidiness of the hero.
Find confirmation of the above in the text. (...a little man in a motley shirt and patched ports. His face and eyes, overgrown with hair and eaten by mountain ash, are barely visible because of thick, overhanging eyebrows... On his head there is a whole cap of long unkempt, tangled hair... He is barefoot.")
Teacher's word.
A.P. Chekhov always advocated respect for human dignity in a person!
Guys, how do you understand the meaning of the word “dignity”?
Find the meaning of this word in explanatory dictionaries. (Dignity is a set of high moral qualities, as well as respect for these qualities in oneself; positive qualities).
Thus, the word “dignity” is synonymous with what word? (self-esteem).
Does Denis Grigoriev respect himself? (No).
Let us pay attention to the speech of Denis Grigoriev. Denis's speech is different in that he does not actually utter words, and when he begins to speak, he himself sometimes does not understand the meaning of what was said.
Find words in the text that confirm this.
How did Denis Grigoriev answer the investigator’s question about unscrewing the nut? (“We know it was”).
If Denis answered this way, then what character traits does this indicate?
(Simple-minded, stupid).
Why did he need the nut? (For the sinker).
How does Denis explain that a nut is suitable for a sinker? (“...you can’t find lead, you have to buy it, but a carnation is not good”).
What is the investigator trying to explain to Denis about his actions and the consequences of these actions? (Unscrewing the nuts leads to an accident).
The investigator says to Denis: “You would have killed people!”
Find the passage where Denis answered him to this phrase. (“God forbid, your honor! Why kill? Are we unbaptized or some kind of villains? ... we lived our century and not only killed, but we didn’t even have such thoughts...”)
Why do you think Denis doesn’t understand that his actions are criminal? (“dark”, uneducated).
Tell me, guys, do you understand what such actions lead to?
Teacher's word.
Now, when mass terrorist attacks and mass metal theft are taking place in the country, this humorous story takes on a sad coloring. Thousands of such Denis think only about momentary gain and do not think about the consequences. He unscrewed it, sawed it off, took it apart, and then there was a flood!
People are dying because of real criminals and criminals due to stupidity!
Another hero of the story belongs to the “powers that be,” he represents the state and the law.
Does it say his name? (No).
Why? (He is devoid of human traits in the story and is only the personification of the judicial and legal system).
How does the speech characterize Denis?
What about an investigator? (He says correctly, he is an educated person).
How does Denis’s speech differ from the investigator’s speech? (The investigator speaks competently, and Denis speaks in a common manner).
Support your words with text.
Physical education minute. Exercises for the eyes.
Teacher's word.
Thus, in the story we have two Russian people who speak different languages and do not understand each other.
Can Denis Grigoriev be called an attacker?
Does the investigator consider him an attacker? (Yes).
Why is the story called this?
Textbook. Working with the article (p. 309).
Let's read the excerpt "A.P. Chekhov" from M. Gorky's essay "Literature and Life".
What can we say about Chekhov’s attitude to the problem of the story “The Intruder” and its hero Denis Grigoriev?
Why does A.P. Chekhov say that he would have released Denis if he were the judge? (Punishment without awareness has no meaning!)
What do you think is the danger of punishing a person who does not understand why he is being punished?
What feelings does Chekhov’s interlocutor, a young lawyer, evoke in Gorky? How do we know about this?
What would you do if you were a judge?
What do you think needs to change in society to make Denis’s act impossible?
Did Denis unscrew the nuts out of malicious intent? (No, I didn’t realize the consequences!)
Are you always aware of the consequences of your actions?
Thus, “BEFORE YOU DO, THINK ABOUT WHAT YOUR ACTION WILL LEAD TO!” (write in notebook).
Teacher. Grading for the lesson.
Now let’s conduct a quiz “The most attentive reader of A.P. Chekhov’s stories.” (Determine who these phrases belong to? What story are they from?)
4.Homework.
Page 311, No. 6. Explain in writing the entry “It is better to die from fools than to accept praise from them.”
application
Quiz “The most attentive reader of A.P. Chekhov’s stories.”
Determine who owns this phrase? What story is it from?
1. “Well, that’s enough! What is this tone for? You and I are childhood friends - and why this respect for rank!”
2 “Well! For how many years now the whole village has been unscrewing the nuts and God preserved them, and then there was a crash... people were killed... If I had taken away the rail or, let’s say, put a log across the track, well, then, perhaps, the train would have deflected, otherwise... ugh! Screw!"
3. “What is the occasion here? Why here? Why are you using your finger? ...Who screamed?”
4. “I thought of it, Your Excellency! – he shouted joyfully, not in his own voice, flying into the general’s office. - I thought of it, God bless the doctor! Oats! Ovsov is the name of the excise man! Ovsov, Your Excellency!
5. “Both eyes filled with tears... Sweat appeared on his long pretty nose. Poor girl!
“I only took it once,” she said in a trembling voice. “I took three rubles from your wife... I didn’t take any more...”
6. “Excuse me, I am a person who works...my job is small. Let them pay me, because maybe I won’t lift this finger for a week... This, your honor, is not in the law to endure from the creature... If everyone bites, then it’s better not to live in the world..”
1.Who owns the phrase______________________
Story "_____________________________________"
2.Who owns the phrase______________________
3.Who owns the phrase_______________________
Story "______________________________________"
4.Who owns the phrase_______________________
Story "______________________________________"
5.Who owns the phrase_______________________
Story "_______________________________________"
6.Who owns the phrase________________________
Story "________________________________________"